| Index: src/compiler/js-native-context-specialization.cc
|
| diff --git a/src/compiler/js-native-context-specialization.cc b/src/compiler/js-native-context-specialization.cc
|
| index 661b025d0acc3d822e3ac1a07d6956c9a6c594ea..88d0fba216e0d8f1ab5febcbd98fccec476b534b 100644
|
| --- a/src/compiler/js-native-context-specialization.cc
|
| +++ b/src/compiler/js-native-context-specialization.cc
|
| @@ -2310,15 +2310,6 @@
|
|
|
| Node* JSNativeContextSpecialization::BuildExtendPropertiesBackingStore(
|
| Handle<Map> map, Node* properties, Node* effect, Node* control) {
|
| - // TODO(bmeurer/jkummerow): Property deletions can undo map transitions
|
| - // while keeping the backing store around, meaning that even though the
|
| - // map might believe that objects have no unused property fields, there
|
| - // might actually be some. It would be nice to not create a new backing
|
| - // store in that case (i.e. when properties->length() >= new_length).
|
| - // However, introducing branches and Phi nodes here would make it more
|
| - // difficult for escape analysis to get rid of the backing stores used
|
| - // for intermediate states of chains of property additions. That makes
|
| - // it unclear what the best approach is here.
|
| DCHECK_EQ(0, map->unused_property_fields());
|
| // Compute the length of the old {properties} and the new properties.
|
| int length = map->NextFreePropertyIndex() - map->GetInObjectProperties();
|
|
|