Chromium Code Reviews| Index: base/synchronization/waitable_event_watcher_unittest.cc |
| diff --git a/base/synchronization/waitable_event_watcher_unittest.cc b/base/synchronization/waitable_event_watcher_unittest.cc |
| index 9df72892c3c3813adf8d1286c7bdf6dfefe48930..d99a75699a2d51c12937f093e27da517a70939fb 100644 |
| --- a/base/synchronization/waitable_event_watcher_unittest.cc |
| +++ b/base/synchronization/waitable_event_watcher_unittest.cc |
| @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ class DecrementCountContainer { |
| explicit DecrementCountContainer(int* counter) : counter_(counter) { |
| } |
| void OnWaitableEventSignaled(WaitableEvent* object) { |
| + // NOTE: |object| may be already deleted. |
| --(*counter_); |
| } |
| private: |
| @@ -117,7 +118,7 @@ void RunTest_OutlivesMessageLoop(MessageLoop::Type message_loop_type) { |
| } |
| } |
| -void RunTest_DeleteUnder(MessageLoop::Type message_loop_type) { |
| +void RunTest_DeleteUnder(MessageLoop::Type message_loop_type, bool with_delay) { |
| // Delete the WaitableEvent out from under the Watcher. This is explictly |
| // allowed by the interface. |
| @@ -126,12 +127,35 @@ void RunTest_DeleteUnder(MessageLoop::Type message_loop_type) { |
| { |
| WaitableEventWatcher watcher; |
| - WaitableEvent* event = |
| - new WaitableEvent(WaitableEvent::ResetPolicy::AUTOMATIC, |
| - WaitableEvent::InitialState::NOT_SIGNALED); |
| + auto event = base::MakeUnique<WaitableEvent>( |
|
danakj
2017/04/27 20:01:08
needs ptr_util.h
atuchin
2017/04/28 06:44:29
Done.
|
| + WaitableEvent::ResetPolicy::AUTOMATIC, |
| + WaitableEvent::InitialState::NOT_SIGNALED); |
| - watcher.StartWatching(event, BindOnce(&QuitWhenSignaled)); |
| - delete event; |
| + watcher.StartWatching(event.get(), BindOnce(&QuitWhenSignaled)); |
| + event.reset(); |
| + if (with_delay) |
| + PlatformThread::Sleep(TimeDelta::FromMilliseconds(10)); |
|
danakj
2017/04/27 20:01:08
What is this sleep meant to do?
atuchin
2017/04/28 06:44:29
Unfortunately, without that sleep the test fails t
danakj
2017/04/28 17:54:49
IIUC we don't have the ability to run code on this
atuchin
2017/05/02 07:41:19
Yes, we don't have a such ability.
But I have foun
|
| + } |
| +} |
| + |
| +void RunTest_SignalAndDelete(MessageLoop::Type message_loop_type, |
| + bool with_delay) { |
| + // Signal and immediately delete the WaitableEvent out from under the Watcher. |
| + |
| + MessageLoop message_loop(message_loop_type); |
| + |
| + { |
| + WaitableEventWatcher watcher; |
| + |
| + auto event = base::MakeUnique<WaitableEvent>( |
| + WaitableEvent::ResetPolicy::AUTOMATIC, |
| + WaitableEvent::InitialState::NOT_SIGNALED); |
| + |
| + watcher.StartWatching(event.get(), BindOnce(&QuitWhenSignaled)); |
| + event->Signal(); |
| + event.reset(); |
| + if (with_delay) |
| + PlatformThread::Sleep(TimeDelta::FromMilliseconds(10)); |
|
danakj
2017/04/27 20:01:08
Also this sleep?
atuchin
2017/04/28 06:44:29
See the answer in another one.
|
| } |
| } |
| @@ -165,7 +189,15 @@ TEST(WaitableEventWatcherTest, OutlivesMessageLoop) { |
| TEST(WaitableEventWatcherTest, DeleteUnder) { |
| for (int i = 0; i < kNumTestingMessageLoops; i++) { |
| - RunTest_DeleteUnder(testing_message_loops[i]); |
| + RunTest_DeleteUnder(testing_message_loops[i], false); |
| + RunTest_DeleteUnder(testing_message_loops[i], true); |
| + } |
| +} |
| + |
| +TEST(WaitableEventWatcherTest, SignalAndDelete) { |
| + for (int i = 0; i < kNumTestingMessageLoops; i++) { |
| + RunTest_SignalAndDelete(testing_message_loops[i], false); |
| + RunTest_SignalAndDelete(testing_message_loops[i], true); |
| } |
| } |