Index: chrome/browser/chromeos/login/screens/device_disabled_screen.cc |
diff --git a/chrome/browser/chromeos/login/screens/device_disabled_screen.cc b/chrome/browser/chromeos/login/screens/device_disabled_screen.cc |
index 66d644c1c6fb0bf47631bf5d51a946636647962c..4ba8b71038b166ab35628b8ff50afb7be922c334 100644 |
--- a/chrome/browser/chromeos/login/screens/device_disabled_screen.cc |
+++ b/chrome/browser/chromeos/login/screens/device_disabled_screen.cc |
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ DeviceDisabledScreen::DeviceDisabledScreen( |
DCHECK(view_); |
if (view_) |
view_->SetDelegate(this); |
+ CHECK(device_disabling_manager_); |
emaxx
2017/04/12 17:05:49
I think DCHECK is more suitable there. See the Sty
achuithb
2017/04/12 19:45:14
Personally I don't see the value of DCHECKing on t
Ivan Šandrk
2017/04/13 13:37:59
It wasn't really crashing on the next line, it was
achuithb
2017/04/13 18:40:03
It's fine if you want to leave in the DCHECK. In g
|
device_disabling_manager_->AddObserver(this); |
} |