Add 4 integration tests for the analysis domain.

Add 4 integration tests for the analysis domain.

BUG=
R=scheglov@google.com

Committed: https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/commit/e572bf93ecea4105da268821c6329fbdf424f26c

[devoncarew, 2017-04-08 20:33:50]

devoncarew@google.com changed reviewers:
+ brianwilkerson@google.com, scheglov@google.com

[devoncarew, 2017-04-08 20:33:50]

This CL adds integration tests for analysis.getReachableSources,
analysis.getLibraryDependencies, analysis.setGeneralSubscriptions, and
analysis.setPriorityFiles. The first two don't have implementations under the
new analysis driver, and we should probably deprecate them.

[scheglov, 2017-04-08 20:50:40]

lgtm

[devoncarew, 2017-04-09 03:56:02]

Description was changed from

==========
Add 4 integration tests for the analysis domain.

BUG=
==========

to

==========
Add 4 integration tests for the analysis domain.

BUG=
R=scheglov@google.com

Committed:
https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/commit/e572bf93ecea4105da268821c6329fbdf424f26c
==========

[devoncarew, 2017-04-09 03:56:04]

Committed patchset #2 (id:20001) manually as
e572bf93ecea4105da268821c6329fbdf424f26c (presubmit successful).

[Brian Wilkerson, 2017-04-09 16:36:05]

lgtm

https://codereview.chromium.org/2808623002/diff/20001/pkg/analysis_server/tes...
File
pkg/analysis_server/test/integration/analysis/get_library_dependencies_test.dart
(right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/2808623002/diff/20001/pkg/analysis_server/tes...
pkg/analysis_server/test/integration/analysis/get_library_dependencies_test.dart:19:
@failingTest
Does the test pass in the non-driver case?

[devoncarew, 2017-04-09 18:23:01]

https://codereview.chromium.org/2808623002/diff/20001/pkg/analysis_server/tes...
File
pkg/analysis_server/test/integration/analysis/get_library_dependencies_test.dart
(right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/2808623002/diff/20001/pkg/analysis_server/tes...
pkg/analysis_server/test/integration/analysis/get_library_dependencies_test.dart:19:
@failingTest
On 2017/04/09 16:36:05, Brian Wilkerson wrote:
> Does the test pass in the non-driver case?

Yes, I wrote the body of the test w/o the driver enabled - so the test is good -
then toggled it since that's what I wanted to be testing.