|
|
Chromium Code Reviews|
Created:
3 years, 8 months ago by llandwerlin Modified:
3 years, 8 months ago Reviewers:
danakj CC:
chromium-reviews, tonikitoo, msisov, fwang Target Ref:
refs/heads/master Project:
chromium Visibility:
Public. |
Descriptionui: dmabuf: match linux header define names
Let's use the same names as we only define them if they're missing them.
BUG=707604
Patch Set 1 #
Total comments: 1
Messages
Total messages: 17 (14 generated)
Description was changed from ========== ui: dmabuf: match linux header define names Let's use the same names as we only define them if they're missing. BUG=707604 ========== to ========== ui: dmabuf: match linux header define names Let's use the same names as we only define them if they're missing them. BUG=707604 ==========
The CQ bit was checked by lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.corp-partner.google.com to run a CQ dry run
Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
Dry run: No L-G-T-M from a valid reviewer yet. CQ run can only be started once the patch has received an L-G-T-M from a full committer. Even if an L-G-T-M may have been provided, it was from a non-committer,_not_ a full super star committer. Committers are members of the group "project-chromium-committers". Note that this has nothing to do with OWNERS files.
The CQ bit was checked by lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.corp-partner.google.com to run a CQ dry run
Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
Dry run: No L-G-T-M from a valid reviewer yet. CQ run can only be started once the patch has received an L-G-T-M from a full committer. Even if an L-G-T-M may have been provided, it was from a non-committer,_not_ a full super star committer. Committers are members of the group "project-chromium-committers". Note that this has nothing to do with OWNERS files.
lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.corp-partner.google.com changed reviewers: + danakj@chromium.org
danakj: PTAL, thanks!
The CQ bit was checked by lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.corp-partner.google.com to run a CQ dry run
Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
Dry run: No L-G-T-M from a valid reviewer yet. CQ run can only be started once the patch has received an L-G-T-M from a full committer. Even if an L-G-T-M may have been provided, it was from a non-committer,_not_ a full super star committer. Committers are members of the group "project-chromium-committers". Note that this has nothing to do with OWNERS files.
https://codereview.chromium.org/2794183002/diff/1/ui/gfx/linux/client_native_... File ui/gfx/linux/client_native_pixmap_dmabuf.cc (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/2794183002/diff/1/ui/gfx/linux/client_native_... ui/gfx/linux/client_native_pixmap_dmabuf.cc:45: struct dma_buf_sync sync_start = {0}; I'm confused, how did this work before with kernels >= 4.6.0 ? There'd have to be LOCAL_ versions of everything in dma-buf.h?
It looks like https://codereview.chromium.org/2805503003/ is doing the same thing. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
