OLD | NEW |
---|---|
(Empty) | |
1 // Copyright 2017 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved. | |
2 // Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be | |
3 // found in the LICENSE file. | |
4 | |
5 #include "modules/document_metadata/CopylessPasteServer.h" | |
6 | |
7 #include "core/frame/LocalFrame.h" | |
8 #include "modules/document_metadata/CopylessPasteExtractor.h" | |
9 #include "mojo/public/cpp/bindings/strong_binding.h" | |
10 | |
11 namespace blink { | |
12 | |
13 CopylessPasteServer::CopylessPasteServer(LocalFrame& frame) : m_frame(frame) {} | |
14 | |
15 void CopylessPasteServer::bindMojoRequest( | |
haraken
2017/03/31 04:20:09
Would you help me understand why you adopted the b
wychen
2017/03/31 07:51:54
For all the visited pages, we want to collect some
haraken
2017/04/04 06:27:57
Makes sense.
| |
16 LocalFrame* frame, | |
17 mojom::blink::CopylessPasteRequest request) { | |
18 DCHECK(frame); | |
19 | |
20 mojo::MakeStrongBinding(WTF::makeUnique<CopylessPasteServer>(*frame), | |
21 std::move(request)); | |
22 } | |
23 | |
24 void CopylessPasteServer::GetEntities(const GetEntitiesCallback& callback) { | |
25 if (!m_frame || !m_frame->document()) { | |
haraken
2017/03/31 04:20:09
Instead of doing this, I'd prefer making CopylessP
wychen
2017/03/31 07:51:54
I'm still trying to figure out whether it makes mo
haraken
2017/04/04 06:27:57
I'd prefer this CL.
Here I'm just asking making C
wychen
2017/04/05 19:25:50
I gave it a try using ContextClient, but it seems
| |
26 callback.Run(mojom::blink::WebPage::New()); | |
27 return; | |
28 } | |
29 mojom::blink::WebPagePtr webpage = mojom::blink::WebPage::New(); | |
30 // TODO(wychen): connect with CopylessPasteExtractor::extract() like: | |
31 // CopylessPasteExtractor::extract(*m_frame->document(), webpage); | |
32 callback.Run(std::move(webpage)); | |
33 } | |
34 | |
35 } // namespace blink | |
OLD | NEW |