Format all multitests

tests/language/constructor_redirect_test.dart

Index: tests/language/constructor_redirect_test.dart
diff --git a/tests/language/constructor_redirect_test.dart b/tests/language/constructor_redirect_test.dart
index 3b0e070f6784c934fc093ad157cb05219c59856b..64616c9e6d644123fe778caeb621b55344854854 100644
--- a/tests/language/constructor_redirect_test.dart
+++ b/tests/language/constructor_redirect_test.dart
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ class A {
   // compile-time error.
   static
   moreStaticFun() {} //# 01: compile-time error
-  int staticFun(int v1, int v2) {
+      int staticFun(int v1, int v2) {

[Bob Nystrom, 2017/03/22 23:46:39]

Is this an artifact of your script? If not, it looks like a formatter bug.

[Jacob, 2017/03/23 17:27:32]

this is how the formatter formats
static
// some comment
int someFunction(int v1, int v2).
Reverted this file.

This line violates the expectation that the multitest line is a valid statement.

[Jacob, 2017/03/23 17:27:32]

Actually this is plausibly the correct format for this multitest as it makes it
less surprising.
On one hand this new formatting while strange is actually consistent with the
behavior interpreting this as a multitest.
when the // # 01: line is removed the program is
  static
      int staticFun(int v1, int v2) {
    return v1
  }


so the 
int staticFun 
line should be indented.

     return v1 * v2;
   }
 }