Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(2059)

Unified Diff: chrome/browser/android/digital_asset_links/digital_asset_links_handler.cc

Issue 2767333006: Add Digital Asset Links verification for postMessage API (Closed)
Patch Set: lizeb@ commetns Created 3 years, 9 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: chrome/browser/android/digital_asset_links/digital_asset_links_handler.cc
diff --git a/chrome/browser/android/digital_asset_links/digital_asset_links_handler.cc b/chrome/browser/android/digital_asset_links/digital_asset_links_handler.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ee569c82a9fbb888694b7871a3d59941a1e087c0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/chrome/browser/android/digital_asset_links/digital_asset_links_handler.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+// Copyright (c) 2017 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include "chrome/browser/android/digital_asset_links/digital_asset_links_handler.h"
+
+#include "base/json/json_reader.h"
+#include "base/logging.h"
+#include "base/strings/string_number_conversions.h"
+#include "base/strings/stringprintf.h"
+#include "base/values.h"
+#include "net/base/load_flags.h"
+#include "net/base/url_util.h"
+#include "net/http/http_response_headers.h"
+#include "net/http/http_status_code.h"
+#include "net/http/http_util.h"
+#include "net/url_request/url_request_status.h"
+
+namespace {
+const char kDigitalAssetLinksBaseURL[] =
+ "https://digitalassetlinks.googleapis.com";
+const char kDigitalAssetLinksCheckAPI[] = "/v1/assetlinks:check?";
+const char kTargetOriginParam[] = "source.web.site";
+const char kSourcePackageNameParam[] = "target.androidApp.packageName";
+const char kSourceFingerprintParam[] =
+ "target.androidApp.certificate.sha256Fingerprint";
+const char kRelationshipParam[] = "relation";
+
+GURL GetUrlForCheckingRelationship(const std::string& web_domain,
+ const std::string& package_name,
+ const std::string& fingerprint,
+ const std::string& relationship) {
+ GURL request_url =
+ GURL(kDigitalAssetLinksBaseURL).Resolve(kDigitalAssetLinksCheckAPI);
+ request_url =
+ net::AppendQueryParameter(request_url, kTargetOriginParam, web_domain);
+ request_url = net::AppendQueryParameter(request_url, kSourcePackageNameParam,
+ package_name);
+ request_url = net::AppendQueryParameter(request_url, kSourceFingerprintParam,
+ fingerprint);
+ request_url =
+ net::AppendQueryParameter(request_url, kRelationshipParam, relationship);
+ DCHECK(request_url.is_valid());
+ return request_url;
+}
+} // namespace
+
+namespace digital_asset_links {
+
+const char kDigitalAssetLinksCheckResponseKeyLinked[] = "linked";
+
+DigitalAssetLinksHandler::DigitalAssetLinksHandler(
+ const scoped_refptr<net::URLRequestContextGetter>& request_context)
+ : request_context_(request_context) {}
+
+DigitalAssetLinksHandler::~DigitalAssetLinksHandler() {}
+
+void DigitalAssetLinksHandler::OnURLFetchComplete(
+ const net::URLFetcher* source) {
+ if (!source->GetStatus().is_success() ||
+ source->GetResponseCode() != net::HTTP_OK) {
+ LOG(WARNING) << base::StringPrintf(
+ "Digital Asset Links endpoint responded with code %d.",
+ source->GetResponseCode());
+ callback_->Run(nullptr);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ std::string response_body;
+ source->GetResponseAsString(&response_body);
+
+ std::unique_ptr<base::Value> value = base::JSONReader::Read(response_body);
Benoit L 2017/04/04 18:44:12 DictionaryValue::From() gives a unique_ptr<> direc
Yusuf 2017/04/05 00:20:42 Done.
+ base::DictionaryValue* dict;
+ if (!value || !value->GetAsDictionary(&dict)) {
+ callback_->Run(std::unique_ptr<base::DictionaryValue>(dict));
+ return;
+ }
+ callback_->Run(nullptr);
Benoit L 2017/04/04 18:44:12 Should we delete the URLFetcher here?
Yusuf 2017/04/05 00:20:42 Resetted. Does that work? :)
+}
+
+bool DigitalAssetLinksHandler::CheckDigitalAssetLinkRelationship(
+ std::unique_ptr<RelationshipCheckResultCallback> listener,
+ const std::string& web_domain,
+ const std::string& package_name,
+ const std::string& fingerprint,
+ const std::string& relationship) {
+ GURL request_url = GetUrlForCheckingRelationship(web_domain, package_name,
+ fingerprint, relationship);
+ if (!request_url.is_valid())
+ return false;
+
+ callback_ = std::move(listener);
Benoit L 2017/04/04 18:44:12 nit: as suggested above, passing the callback by v
Yusuf 2017/04/05 00:20:42 Done.
+
+ url_fetcher_ = std::move(
Benoit L 2017/04/04 18:44:12 dumb question: is it OK to delete a URLFetcher whi
Yusuf 2017/04/05 00:20:42 I think so yes. At least I have seen examples of t
+ net::URLFetcher::Create(0, request_url, net::URLFetcher::GET, this));
+ url_fetcher_->SetAutomaticallyRetryOn5xx(false);
+ url_fetcher_->SetRequestContext(request_context_.get());
+ url_fetcher_->Start();
+ return true;
+}
+
+} // namespace digital_asset_links

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698