Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(1560)

Unified Diff: extensions/browser/renderer_startup_helper.cc

Issue 2766263003: Extensions: Only load incognito-enabled extensions in an incognito renderer. (Closed)
Patch Set: -- Created 3 years, 9 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: extensions/browser/renderer_startup_helper.cc
diff --git a/extensions/browser/renderer_startup_helper.cc b/extensions/browser/renderer_startup_helper.cc
index 8d0a9b31e3910bc02f66c9b246d4a0dc14cc9693..86c4ae1d88193ab59890b523809889d4cbdf9436 100644
--- a/extensions/browser/renderer_startup_helper.cc
+++ b/extensions/browser/renderer_startup_helper.cc
@@ -7,11 +7,13 @@
#include "base/stl_util.h"
#include "base/values.h"
#include "components/keyed_service/content/browser_context_dependency_manager.h"
+#include "content/public/browser/browser_context.h"
#include "content/public/browser/notification_service.h"
#include "content/public/browser/notification_types.h"
#include "content/public/browser/render_process_host.h"
#include "extensions/browser/extension_function_dispatcher.h"
#include "extensions/browser/extension_registry.h"
+#include "extensions/browser/extension_util.h"
#include "extensions/browser/extensions_browser_client.h"
#include "extensions/browser/guest_view/web_view/web_view_guest.h"
#include "extensions/common/extension_messages.h"
@@ -25,6 +27,28 @@ using content::BrowserContext;
namespace extensions {
+namespace {
+
+// Returns whether the |extension| should be loaded in the given
+// renderer |process|.
+bool IsExtensionVisibleToProcess(const Extension& extension,
+ content::RenderProcessHost* process) {
+ // Renderers don't need to know about themes.
+ if (extension.is_theme())
+ return false;
+
+ // Only extensions enabled in incognito mode should be loaded in an incognito
+ // renderer. However extensions which can't be loaded in the incognito mode
+ // (e.g. platform apps) should also be loaded in an incognito renderer to
+ // ensure connections from incognito tabs to such extensions work fine.
Devlin 2017/03/23 22:08:37 nitty nit: omit ' fine' -> 'ensure connections fro
karandeepb 2017/04/04 03:44:15 Done.
+ content::BrowserContext* browser_context = process->GetBrowserContext();
+ return !browser_context->IsOffTheRecord() ||
+ !util::CanBeIncognitoEnabled(&extension) ||
+ util::IsIncognitoEnabled(extension.id(), browser_context);
+}
+
+} // namespace
+
RendererStartupHelper::RendererStartupHelper(BrowserContext* browser_context)
: browser_context_(browser_context) {
DCHECK(browser_context);
@@ -98,17 +122,17 @@ void RendererStartupHelper::InitializeProcess(
const ExtensionSet& extensions =
ExtensionRegistry::Get(browser_context_)->enabled_extensions();
for (const auto& ext : extensions) {
- // Renderers don't need to know about themes.
- if (!ext->is_theme()) {
- // TODO(kalman): Only include tab specific permissions for extension
- // processes, no other process needs it, so it's mildly wasteful.
- // I am not sure this is possible to know this here, at such a low
- // level of the stack. Perhaps site isolation can help.
- bool include_tab_permissions = true;
- loaded_extensions_params.push_back(
- ExtensionMsg_Loaded_Params(ext.get(), include_tab_permissions));
- loaded_extensions->insert(ext->id());
- }
+ if (!IsExtensionVisibleToProcess(*ext, process))
Devlin 2017/03/23 22:08:37 nitty nit: We actually only need the browser conte
karandeepb 2017/04/04 03:44:15 Done.
+ continue;
+
+ // TODO(kalman): Only include tab specific permissions for extension
+ // processes, no other process needs it, so it's mildly wasteful.
+ // I am not sure this is possible to know this here, at such a low
+ // level of the stack. Perhaps site isolation can help.
+ bool include_tab_permissions = true;
+ loaded_extensions_params.push_back(
+ ExtensionMsg_Loaded_Params(ext.get(), include_tab_permissions));
+ loaded_extensions->insert(ext->id());
}
// Activate pending extensions.
@@ -138,10 +162,7 @@ void RendererStartupHelper::UntrackProcess(
void RendererStartupHelper::ActivateExtensionInProcess(
const Extension& extension,
content::RenderProcessHost* process) {
- // Renderers don't need to know about themes. We also don't normally
- // "activate" themes, but this could happen if someone tries to open a tab
- // to the e.g. theme's manifest.
- if (extension.is_theme())
+ if (!IsExtensionVisibleToProcess(extension, process))
return;
const auto& process_extensions_pair = loaded_extensions_.find(process);
@@ -159,10 +180,6 @@ void RendererStartupHelper::ActivateExtensionInProcess(
}
void RendererStartupHelper::OnExtensionLoaded(const Extension& extension) {
- // Renderers don't need to know about themes.
- if (extension.is_theme())
- return;
Devlin 2017/03/23 22:08:37 I wonder if it's worth keeping this short-circuit,
karandeepb 2017/04/04 03:44:15 Centralizing the logic in IsExtensionVisibleToProc
Devlin 2017/04/04 15:15:05 Given it's somewhat performance-sensitive code, le
-
// We don't need to include tab permisisons here, since the extension
// was just loaded.
// Uninitialized renderers will be informed of the extension load during the
@@ -177,6 +194,9 @@ void RendererStartupHelper::OnExtensionLoaded(const Extension& extension) {
continue;
content::RenderProcessHost* process = process_extensions_pair.first;
+ if (!IsExtensionVisibleToProcess(extension, process))
+ continue;
+
process->Send(new ExtensionMsg_Loaded(params));
process_extensions_pair.second.insert(extension.id());
}

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698