Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(1240)

Unified Diff: mojo/edk/system/signals_unittest.cc

Issue 2741033003: Mojo EDK: Introduce MojoQueryHandleSignalsState API (Closed)
Patch Set: fix stupid bad DCHECK Created 3 years, 9 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « mojo/edk/system/multiprocess_message_pipe_unittest.cc ('k') | mojo/edk/test/mojo_test_base.h » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: mojo/edk/system/signals_unittest.cc
diff --git a/mojo/edk/system/signals_unittest.cc b/mojo/edk/system/signals_unittest.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e8b0cd1914007bc378604afa3bbe4f8325674961
--- /dev/null
+++ b/mojo/edk/system/signals_unittest.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+// Copyright 2017 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include "mojo/edk/test/mojo_test_base.h"
+#include "mojo/public/c/system/buffer.h"
+#include "mojo/public/c/system/data_pipe.h"
+#include "mojo/public/c/system/functions.h"
+#include "mojo/public/c/system/message_pipe.h"
+#include "mojo/public/c/system/types.h"
+
+namespace mojo {
+namespace edk {
+namespace {
+
+using SignalsTest = test::MojoTestBase;
+
+TEST_F(SignalsTest, QueryInvalidArguments) {
+ MojoHandleSignalsState state = {0, 0};
+ EXPECT_EQ(MOJO_RESULT_INVALID_ARGUMENT,
+ MojoQueryHandleSignalsState(MOJO_HANDLE_INVALID, &state));
+
+ MojoHandle a, b;
+ CreateMessagePipe(&a, &b);
+ EXPECT_EQ(MOJO_RESULT_INVALID_ARGUMENT,
+ MojoQueryHandleSignalsState(a, nullptr));
+}
+
+TEST_F(SignalsTest, QueryMessagePipeSignals) {
+ MojoHandleSignalsState state = {0, 0};
+
+ MojoHandle a, b;
+ CreateMessagePipe(&a, &b);
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(MOJO_RESULT_OK, MojoQueryHandleSignalsState(a, &state));
+ EXPECT_EQ(MOJO_HANDLE_SIGNAL_WRITABLE, state.satisfied_signals);
+ EXPECT_EQ(MOJO_HANDLE_SIGNAL_READABLE | MOJO_HANDLE_SIGNAL_WRITABLE |
+ MOJO_HANDLE_SIGNAL_PEER_CLOSED,
+ state.satisfiable_signals);
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(MOJO_RESULT_OK, MojoQueryHandleSignalsState(b, &state));
+ EXPECT_EQ(MOJO_HANDLE_SIGNAL_WRITABLE, state.satisfied_signals);
+ EXPECT_EQ(MOJO_HANDLE_SIGNAL_READABLE | MOJO_HANDLE_SIGNAL_WRITABLE |
+ MOJO_HANDLE_SIGNAL_PEER_CLOSED,
+ state.satisfiable_signals);
+
+ WriteMessage(a, "ok");
+ EXPECT_EQ(MOJO_RESULT_OK, WaitForSignals(b, MOJO_HANDLE_SIGNAL_READABLE));
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(MOJO_RESULT_OK, MojoQueryHandleSignalsState(b, &state));
+ EXPECT_EQ(MOJO_HANDLE_SIGNAL_READABLE | MOJO_HANDLE_SIGNAL_WRITABLE,
+ state.satisfied_signals);
+ EXPECT_EQ(MOJO_HANDLE_SIGNAL_READABLE | MOJO_HANDLE_SIGNAL_WRITABLE |
+ MOJO_HANDLE_SIGNAL_PEER_CLOSED,
+ state.satisfiable_signals);
+
+ EXPECT_EQ("ok", ReadMessage(b));
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(MOJO_RESULT_OK, MojoQueryHandleSignalsState(b, &state));
+ EXPECT_EQ(MOJO_HANDLE_SIGNAL_WRITABLE, state.satisfied_signals);
+ EXPECT_EQ(MOJO_HANDLE_SIGNAL_READABLE | MOJO_HANDLE_SIGNAL_WRITABLE |
+ MOJO_HANDLE_SIGNAL_PEER_CLOSED,
+ state.satisfiable_signals);
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(MOJO_RESULT_OK, MojoClose(a));
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(MOJO_RESULT_OK, WaitForSignals(b, MOJO_HANDLE_SIGNAL_PEER_CLOSED));
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(MOJO_RESULT_OK, MojoQueryHandleSignalsState(b, &state));
+ EXPECT_EQ(MOJO_HANDLE_SIGNAL_PEER_CLOSED, state.satisfied_signals);
+ EXPECT_EQ(MOJO_HANDLE_SIGNAL_PEER_CLOSED, state.satisfiable_signals);
+}
+
+} // namespace
+} // namespace edk
+} // namespace mojo
« no previous file with comments | « mojo/edk/system/multiprocess_message_pipe_unittest.cc ('k') | mojo/edk/test/mojo_test_base.h » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698