Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(182)

Side by Side Diff: tests/lib/mirrors/get_field_test.dart

Issue 273723003: Assume a method can be torn off, if it's accessible through reflection. (Closed) Base URL: https://dart.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge/dart
Patch Set: More test and fixes. Created 6 years, 7 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View unified diff | Download patch | Annotate | Revision Log
OLDNEW
(Empty)
1 // Copyright (c) 2013, the Dart project authors. Please see the AUTHORS file
2 // for details. All rights reserved. Use of this source code is governed by a
3 // BSD-style license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
4
5 @MirrorsUsed(targets: "A")
6 import 'dart:mirrors';
7
8 import 'package:expect/expect.dart';
9
10 class A {
11 foo(y, [x]) => y;
12 operator+(other) => null;
13 get bar => 499;
14 operator$foo([optional = 499]) => optional;
15 }
16
17 main() {
18 // We are using `getField` to tear off `foo`. We must make sure that all
19 // stub methods are installed.
20 var closure = reflect(new A()).getField(#foo).reflectee;
21 Expect.equals("b", closure("b"));
22
23 closure = reflect(new A()).getField(#operator$foo).reflectee;
24 Expect.equals(499, closure());
25 }
OLDNEW

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698