Chromium Code Reviews| Index: third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/compositing/overflow/composited-nested-sticky-inline.html |
| diff --git a/third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/compositing/overflow/composited-nested-sticky-inline.html b/third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/compositing/overflow/composited-nested-sticky-inline.html |
| new file mode 100644 |
| index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2ab75b6162a2be506bfe069fea65e026eac40199 |
| --- /dev/null |
| +++ b/third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/compositing/overflow/composited-nested-sticky-inline.html |
| @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ |
| +<style> |
| +body { |
| + margin: 0; |
| +} |
| + |
| +.scroller { |
| + /* TODO(smcgruer): Appears to be a paint bug if the scroller is composited. */ |
|
flackr
2017/03/17 15:01:56
What is the bug? We shouldn't be trying to do stic
smcgruer
2017/03/17 17:36:52
Filed crbug.com/702637 and reverted this LayoutTes
|
| + /* will-change: transform; */ |
| + |
| + overflow: auto; |
| + width: 200px; |
| + height: 350px; |
| + outline: 2px solid black; |
| +} |
| + |
| +.container { |
| + width: 200px; |
| + height: 700px; |
| +} |
| + |
| +.outerSticky { |
| + will-change: transform; |
| + |
| + display: inline; |
| + position: sticky; |
| + top: 0; |
| +} |
| + |
| +.innerSticky { |
| + will-change: transform; |
| + |
| + display: inline; |
| + position: sticky; |
| + top: 25px; |
| +} |
| +</style> |
| + |
| +<script> |
| +if (window.testRunner) |
| + testRunner.waitUntilDone(); |
| + |
| +function finishTest() { |
| + document.querySelector('.scroller').scrollTop = 200; |
| + if (window.testRunner) |
| + testRunner.notifyDone(); |
| +} |
| + |
| +window.addEventListener('load', function() { |
| + requestAnimationFrame(function() { |
| + requestAnimationFrame(finishTest); |
| + }); |
| +}); |
| +</script> |
| + |
| +<div class="scroller"> |
| + <div class="container"> |
| + <div class="outerSticky">1<div class="innerSticky">2</div></div> |
| + </div> |
| +</div> |