Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(335)

Unified Diff: tests/lib/mirrors/mixin_application_test.dart

Issue 27275002: Add test for ClassMirror.mixin. Rename the mixin application test. (Closed) Base URL: https://dart.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge/dart
Patch Set: Created 7 years, 2 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: tests/lib/mirrors/mixin_application_test.dart
diff --git a/tests/lib/mirrors/mixin_test.dart b/tests/lib/mirrors/mixin_application_test.dart
similarity index 82%
copy from tests/lib/mirrors/mixin_test.dart
copy to tests/lib/mirrors/mixin_application_test.dart
index 4a21544bb296e41e7cc5b84d71c7976983e63ae2..506b026763b0216f15020360a67b56158e807bd1 100644
--- a/tests/lib/mirrors/mixin_test.dart
+++ b/tests/lib/mirrors/mixin_application_test.dart
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
// versa.
// TODO(ahe): When both implementations agree, remove the multi-test parts.
-library test.mixin_test;
+library test.mixin_application_test;
import 'dart:mirrors';
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ expectSame(ClassMirror a, ClassMirror b) {
testMixin() {
checkClass(Mixin, [
- 'Class(s(Mixin) in s(test.mixin_test), top-level)',
+ 'Class(s(Mixin) in s(test.mixin_application_test), top-level)',
'Class(s(Object) in s(dart.core), top-level)',
]);
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ testMixin() {
testMixin2() {
checkClass(Mixin2, [
- 'Class(s(Mixin2) in s(test.mixin_test), top-level)',
+ 'Class(s(Mixin2) in s(test.mixin_application_test), top-level)',
'Class(s(Object) in s(dart.core), top-level)',
]);
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ testMixin2() {
testMixinApplication() {
checkClass(MixinApplication, [
- 'Class(s(MixinApplication) in s(test.mixin_test), top-level)',
+ 'Class(s(MixinApplication) in s(test.mixin_application_test), top-level)',
'Class(s(C) in s(test.model), top-level)',
'Class(s(B) in s(test.model), top-level)',
'Class(s(A) in s(test.model), top-level)',
@@ -116,11 +116,11 @@ testMixinApplication() {
testMixinApplicationA() {
// TODO(ahe): I don't think an anonymous mixin has an owner.
- String owner = ' in s(test.mixin_test)';
+ String owner = ' in s(test.mixin_application_test)';
owner = ''; /// 01: ok
checkClass(MixinApplicationA, [
- 'Class(s(MixinApplicationA) in s(test.mixin_test), top-level)',
- 'Class(s(test.model.C with test.mixin_test.Mixin)$owner, top-level)',
+ 'Class(s(MixinApplicationA) in s(test.mixin_application_test), top-level)',
ahe 2013/10/15 06:58:48 Long line, more below.
rmacnak 2013/10/15 16:55:30 Got 'em.
+ 'Class(s(test.model.C with test.mixin_application_test.Mixin)$owner, top-level)',
'Class(s(C) in s(test.model), top-level)',
'Class(s(B) in s(test.model), top-level)',
'Class(s(A) in s(test.model), top-level)',
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ testMixinApplicationA() {
' m: Method(s(m) in s(Mixin))}',
reflectClass(MixinApplicationA).superclass.members);
- String name = 'test.model.C with test.mixin_test.Mixin';
+ String name = 'test.model.C with test.mixin_application_test.Mixin';
name = 'Mixin'; /// 01: ok
expect(
'{$name:'
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ testMixinApplicationA() {
testUnusedMixinApplication() {
checkClass(UnusedMixinApplication, [
- 'Class(s(UnusedMixinApplication) in s(test.mixin_test), top-level)',
+ 'Class(s(UnusedMixinApplication) in s(test.mixin_application_test), top-level)',
'Class(s(C) in s(test.model), top-level)',
'Class(s(B) in s(test.model), top-level)',
'Class(s(A) in s(test.model), top-level)',
@@ -182,11 +182,11 @@ testUnusedMixinApplication() {
}
testSubclass() {
- String owner = ' in s(test.mixin_test)';
+ String owner = ' in s(test.mixin_application_test)';
owner = ''; /// 01: ok
checkClass(Subclass, [
- 'Class(s(Subclass) in s(test.mixin_test), top-level)',
- 'Class(s(test.model.C with test.mixin_test.Mixin)$owner, top-level)',
+ 'Class(s(Subclass) in s(test.mixin_application_test), top-level)',
+ 'Class(s(test.model.C with test.mixin_application_test.Mixin)$owner, top-level)',
'Class(s(C) in s(test.model), top-level)',
'Class(s(B) in s(test.model), top-level)',
'Class(s(A) in s(test.model), top-level)',
@@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ testSubclass() {
' m: Method(s(m) in s(Mixin))}',
reflectClass(Subclass).superclass.members);
- String name = 'test.model.C with test.mixin_test.Mixin';
+ String name = 'test.model.C with test.mixin_application_test.Mixin';
name = 'Mixin'; /// 01: ok
expect(
'{$name:'
@@ -221,8 +221,8 @@ testSubclass() {
testSubclass2() {
checkClass(Subclass2, [
- 'Class(s(Subclass2) in s(test.mixin_test), top-level)',
- 'Class(s(MixinApplication) in s(test.mixin_test), top-level)',
+ 'Class(s(Subclass2) in s(test.mixin_application_test), top-level)',
+ 'Class(s(MixinApplication) in s(test.mixin_application_test), top-level)',
'Class(s(C) in s(test.model), top-level)',
'Class(s(B) in s(test.model), top-level)',
'Class(s(A) in s(test.model), top-level)',
@@ -244,13 +244,13 @@ testSubclass2() {
testSubclassA() {
// TODO(ahe): I don't think an anonymous mixin has an owner.
- String owner = ' in s(test.mixin_test)';
+ String owner = ' in s(test.mixin_application_test)';
owner = ''; /// 01: ok
checkClass(SubclassA, [
- 'Class(s(SubclassA) in s(test.mixin_test), top-level)',
- 'Class(s(test.model.C with test.mixin_test.Mixin, test.mixin_test.Mixin2)'
+ 'Class(s(SubclassA) in s(test.mixin_application_test), top-level)',
+ 'Class(s(test.model.C with test.mixin_application_test.Mixin, test.mixin_application_test.Mixin2)'
'$owner, top-level)',
- 'Class(s(test.model.C with test.mixin_test.Mixin)$owner, top-level)',
+ 'Class(s(test.model.C with test.mixin_application_test.Mixin)$owner, top-level)',
'Class(s(C) in s(test.model), top-level)',
'Class(s(B) in s(test.model), top-level)',
'Class(s(A) in s(test.model), top-level)',
@@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ testSubclassA() {
reflectClass(SubclassA).superclass.members);
String name =
- 'test.model.C with test.mixin_test.Mixin, test.mixin_test.Mixin2';
+ 'test.model.C with test.mixin_application_test.Mixin, test.mixin_application_test.Mixin2';
name = 'Mixin2'; /// 01: ok
expect(
'{$name: Method(s($name) in s($name), constructor)}',
@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ testSubclassA() {
' m: Method(s(m) in s(Mixin))}',
reflectClass(SubclassA).superclass.superclass.members);
- name = 'test.model.C with test.mixin_test.Mixin';
+ name = 'test.model.C with test.mixin_application_test.Mixin';
name = 'Mixin'; /// 01: ok
expect(
'{$name:'
@@ -297,12 +297,12 @@ testSubclassA() {
testSubclass2A() {
// TODO(ahe): I don't think an anonymous mixin has an owner.
- String owner = ' in s(test.mixin_test)';
+ String owner = ' in s(test.mixin_application_test)';
owner = ''; /// 01: ok
checkClass(Subclass2A, [
- 'Class(s(Subclass2A) in s(test.mixin_test), top-level)',
- 'Class(s(MixinApplicationA) in s(test.mixin_test), top-level)',
- 'Class(s(test.model.C with test.mixin_test.Mixin)$owner,'
+ 'Class(s(Subclass2A) in s(test.mixin_application_test), top-level)',
+ 'Class(s(MixinApplicationA) in s(test.mixin_application_test), top-level)',
+ 'Class(s(test.model.C with test.mixin_application_test.Mixin)$owner,'
' top-level)',
'Class(s(C) in s(test.model), top-level)',
'Class(s(B) in s(test.model), top-level)',

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698