jbroman
2017/03/02 20:50:47
nit: I'd just inline this into MojoDuplicateBuffer
nit: I'd just inline this into MojoDuplicateBufferHandleOptions. {readOnly:
true} seems like it's just as useful as {flags: {readOnly: true}}, but it's
shorter, simpler and faster. I see the fact that they're nested in Mojo as an
artifact of C vs JS API style.
On 2017/03/02 20:50:47, jbroman wrote:
> nit: I'd just inline this into MojoDuplicateBufferHandleOptions. {readOnly:
> true} seems like it's just as useful as {flags: {readOnly: true}}, but it's
> shorter, simpler and faster. I see the fact that they're nested in Mojo as an
> artifact of C vs JS API style.
Issue 2720873002: Implements JS bindings for mojo shared buffer.
(Closed)
Created 3 years, 9 months ago by alokp
Modified 3 years, 9 months ago
Reviewers: jbroman, Ken Rockot(use gerrit already), yzshen1
Base URL:
Comments: 29