Rename Origin.unique() to opaque().

content/browser/browsing_data/browsing_data_filter_builder_impl.cc

Index: content/browser/browsing_data/browsing_data_filter_builder_impl.cc
diff --git a/content/browser/browsing_data/browsing_data_filter_builder_impl.cc b/content/browser/browsing_data/browsing_data_filter_builder_impl.cc
index 18f93a6502f20c03abbb50a63e403741f2dd2988..4770f4f824eef71d24d9aa7c6b63cc18e555423a 100644
--- a/content/browser/browsing_data/browsing_data_filter_builder_impl.cc
+++ b/content/browser/browsing_data/browsing_data_filter_builder_impl.cc
@@ -133,12 +133,12 @@ void BrowsingDataFilterBuilderImpl::AddOrigin(const url::Origin& origin) {
   DCHECK_LE(origins_.size(), 10U) << "OriginFilterBuilder is only suitable "
                                      "for creating small filters.";
 
-  // By limiting the filter to non-unique origins, we can guarantee that
+  // By limiting the filter to non-opaque origins, we can guarantee that
   // origin1 < origin2 && origin1 > origin2 <=> origin1.isSameOrigin(origin2).
   // This means that std::set::find() will use the same semantics for
   // origin comparison as Origin::IsSameOriginWith(). Furthermore, this
   // means that two filters are equal iff they are equal element-wise.
-  DCHECK(!origin.unique()) << "Invalid origin passed into OriginFilter.";
+  DCHECK(!origin.opaque()) << "Invalid origin passed into OriginFilter.";
 
   // TODO(msramek): All urls with file scheme currently map to the same
   // origin. This is currently not a problem, but if it becomes one,