Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(226)

Unified Diff: chrome/browser/chromeos/login/quick_unlock/fingerprint_unlock_unittest.cc

Issue 2715823004: Add FingerprintUnlock KeyedService for each profile (Closed)
Patch Set: Created 3 years, 10 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: chrome/browser/chromeos/login/quick_unlock/fingerprint_unlock_unittest.cc
diff --git a/chrome/browser/chromeos/login/quick_unlock/fingerprint_unlock_unittest.cc b/chrome/browser/chromeos/login/quick_unlock/fingerprint_unlock_unittest.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..58fc12727f6f33b260b36c7bda06db5fd8ad8818
--- /dev/null
+++ b/chrome/browser/chromeos/login/quick_unlock/fingerprint_unlock_unittest.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,202 @@
+// Copyright 2017 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include "chrome/browser/chromeos/login/quick_unlock/fingerprint_unlock.h"
+#include "chrome/browser/chromeos/login/quick_unlock/fingerprint_unlock_factory.h"
+#include "chrome/browser/chromeos/login/quick_unlock/quick_unlock_utils.h"
+#include "chrome/common/pref_names.h"
+#include "chrome/test/base/testing_profile.h"
+#include "components/prefs/pref_service.h"
+#include "content/public/test/test_browser_thread_bundle.h"
+#include "testing/gtest/include/gtest/gtest.h"
+
+namespace chromeos {
+namespace {
+
+void SetConfirmationFrequency(
+ PrefService* pref_service,
+ quick_unlock::PasswordConfirmationFrequency frequency) {
+ pref_service->SetInteger(prefs::kQuickUnlockTimeout,
+ static_cast<int>(frequency));
+}
+
+class FingerprintUnlockUnitTest : public testing::Test {
+ protected:
+ FingerprintUnlockUnitTest() : profile_(new TestingProfile()) {}
+ ~FingerprintUnlockUnitTest() override {}
+
+ // testing::Test:
+ void SetUp() override { quick_unlock::EnableForTesting(); }
+
+ content::TestBrowserThreadBundle thread_bundle_;
+ std::unique_ptr<TestingProfile> profile_;
+
+ DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(FingerprintUnlockUnitTest);
+};
+
+} // namespace
+
+// Provides test-only FingerprintUnlock APIs.
+class FingerprintUnlockTestApi {
+ public:
+ // Does *not* take ownership over |fingerprint_unlock|.
+ explicit FingerprintUnlockTestApi(
+ quick_unlock::FingerprintUnlock* fingerprint_unlock)
+ : fingerprint_unlock_(fingerprint_unlock) {}
+
+ // Reduces the amount of strong auth time available by |time_delta|.
+ void ReduceRemainingStrongAuthTimeBy(const base::TimeDelta& time_delta) {
+ fingerprint_unlock_->last_strong_auth_ -= time_delta;
+ }
+
+ bool HasStrongAuthInfo() {
+ return !fingerprint_unlock_->last_strong_auth_.is_null();
+ }
+
+ void SetEnrollments(bool has_enrollments) {
+ fingerprint_unlock_->has_enrollments_ = has_enrollments;
+ }
+
+ private:
+ quick_unlock::FingerprintUnlock* fingerprint_unlock_;
+
+ DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(FingerprintUnlockTestApi);
+};
+
+// Verifies that:
+// 1. Initial unlock attempt count is zero.
+// 2. Attempting unlock attempts correctly increases unlock attempt count.
+// 3. Resetting unlock attempt count correctly sets attempt count to 0.
+TEST_F(FingerprintUnlockUnitTest, UnlockAttemptCount) {
+ quick_unlock::FingerprintUnlock* fingerprint_unlock =
+ quick_unlock::FingerprintUnlockFactory::GetForProfile(profile_.get());
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, fingerprint_unlock->unlock_attempt_count());
+
+ fingerprint_unlock->AddUnlockAttempt();
+ fingerprint_unlock->AddUnlockAttempt();
+ fingerprint_unlock->AddUnlockAttempt();
+ EXPECT_EQ(3, fingerprint_unlock->unlock_attempt_count());
+
+ fingerprint_unlock->ResetUnlockAttemptCount();
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, fingerprint_unlock->unlock_attempt_count());
+}
+
+// Verifies that marking the strong auth makes TimeSinceLastStrongAuth a > zero
+// value.
+TEST_F(FingerprintUnlockUnitTest, TimeSinceLastStrongAuthReturnsPositiveValue) {
+ quick_unlock::FingerprintUnlock* fingerprint_unlock =
+ quick_unlock::FingerprintUnlockFactory::GetForProfile(profile_.get());
+ FingerprintUnlockTestApi test_api(fingerprint_unlock);
+
+ EXPECT_FALSE(test_api.HasStrongAuthInfo());
+
+ fingerprint_unlock->MarkStrongAuth();
+
+ EXPECT_TRUE(test_api.HasStrongAuthInfo());
+ test_api.ReduceRemainingStrongAuthTimeBy(base::TimeDelta::FromSeconds(60));
+
+ EXPECT_TRUE(fingerprint_unlock->TimeSinceLastStrongAuth() >=
+ base::TimeDelta::FromSeconds(30));
stevenjb 2017/02/27 17:25:34 It isn't clear whether 60 and 30 are arbitrary or
xiaoyinh(OOO Sep 11-29) 2017/02/27 21:36:42 Done.
+}
+
+// Verifies that by altering the password confirmation preference, the
+// fingerprint unlock will request password reconfirmation as expected.
+TEST_F(FingerprintUnlockUnitTest,
+ QuickUnlockPasswordConfirmationFrequencyPreference) {
+ quick_unlock::FingerprintUnlock* fingerprint_unlock =
+ quick_unlock::FingerprintUnlockFactory::GetForProfile(profile_.get());
+ PrefService* pref_service = profile_->GetPrefs();
+ FingerprintUnlockTestApi test_api(fingerprint_unlock);
+
+ // The default is one day, so verify moving the last strong auth time back 13
+ // hours should not request strong auth.
+ fingerprint_unlock->MarkStrongAuth();
+ test_api.ReduceRemainingStrongAuthTimeBy(base::TimeDelta::FromHours(13));
stevenjb 2017/02/27 17:25:34 Again, use named constants throughout.
xiaoyinh(OOO Sep 11-29) 2017/02/27 21:36:42 Done.
+ EXPECT_TRUE(fingerprint_unlock->HasStrongAuth());
+
+ // Verify moving the last strong auth time back another 13 hours should
+ // request strong auth.
+ test_api.ReduceRemainingStrongAuthTimeBy(base::TimeDelta::FromHours(13));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(fingerprint_unlock->HasStrongAuth());
+
+ // Verify that by changing the frequency of required password confirmation to
+ // six hours, moving the last strong auth interval back by 4 hours will not
+ // trigger a request for strong auth, but moving it by an additional 4 hours
+ // will.
+ fingerprint_unlock->MarkStrongAuth();
+ SetConfirmationFrequency(
+ pref_service, quick_unlock::PasswordConfirmationFrequency::SIX_HOURS);
+ test_api.ReduceRemainingStrongAuthTimeBy(base::TimeDelta::FromHours(4));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(fingerprint_unlock->HasStrongAuth());
+ test_api.ReduceRemainingStrongAuthTimeBy(base::TimeDelta::FromHours(4));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(fingerprint_unlock->HasStrongAuth());
+
+ // A valid strong auth becomes invalid if the confirmation frequency is
+ // shortened to less than the expiration time.
+ fingerprint_unlock->MarkStrongAuth();
+ SetConfirmationFrequency(
+ pref_service, quick_unlock::PasswordConfirmationFrequency::TWELVE_HOURS);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(fingerprint_unlock->HasStrongAuth());
+ test_api.ReduceRemainingStrongAuthTimeBy(base::TimeDelta::FromHours(8));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(fingerprint_unlock->HasStrongAuth());
+ SetConfirmationFrequency(
+ pref_service, quick_unlock::PasswordConfirmationFrequency::SIX_HOURS);
+ EXPECT_FALSE(fingerprint_unlock->HasStrongAuth());
+
+ // An expired strong auth becomes usable if the confirmation frequency gets
+ // extended past the expiration time.
+ fingerprint_unlock->MarkStrongAuth();
+ SetConfirmationFrequency(
+ pref_service, quick_unlock::PasswordConfirmationFrequency::SIX_HOURS);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(fingerprint_unlock->HasStrongAuth());
+ test_api.ReduceRemainingStrongAuthTimeBy(base::TimeDelta::FromHours(8));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(fingerprint_unlock->HasStrongAuth());
+ SetConfirmationFrequency(
+ pref_service, quick_unlock::PasswordConfirmationFrequency::TWELVE_HOURS);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(fingerprint_unlock->HasStrongAuth());
+}
+
+// Verifies that authentication is not available when
+// 1. No enrollments registered
+// 2. Too many authentication attempts
+// 3. No valid strong auth
+TEST_F(FingerprintUnlockUnitTest, AuthenticationUnAvailable) {
+ quick_unlock::FingerprintUnlock* fingerprint_unlock =
+ quick_unlock::FingerprintUnlockFactory::GetForProfile(profile_.get());
+ FingerprintUnlockTestApi test_api(fingerprint_unlock);
+
+ EXPECT_FALSE(test_api.HasStrongAuthInfo());
+ fingerprint_unlock->MarkStrongAuth();
+ EXPECT_TRUE(test_api.HasStrongAuthInfo());
+
+ EXPECT_FALSE(fingerprint_unlock->HasEnrollment());
+ test_api.SetEnrollments(true);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(fingerprint_unlock->HasEnrollment());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, fingerprint_unlock->unlock_attempt_count());
+ EXPECT_TRUE(fingerprint_unlock->IsFingerprintAuthenticationAvailable());
+
+ // No enrollment registered makes fingerprint authentication unavailable.
+ test_api.SetEnrollments(false);
+ EXPECT_FALSE(fingerprint_unlock->IsFingerprintAuthenticationAvailable());
+ test_api.SetEnrollments(true);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(fingerprint_unlock->IsFingerprintAuthenticationAvailable());
+
+ // Too many authentication attempts make fingerprint authentication
+ // unavailable.
+ for (int i = 0; i < quick_unlock::FingerprintUnlock::kMaximumUnlockAttempts;
+ ++i)
+ fingerprint_unlock->AddUnlockAttempt();
stevenjb 2017/02/27 17:25:34 {}
xiaoyinh(OOO Sep 11-29) 2017/02/27 21:36:43 Done.
+ EXPECT_FALSE(fingerprint_unlock->IsFingerprintAuthenticationAvailable());
+ fingerprint_unlock->ResetUnlockAttemptCount();
+ EXPECT_TRUE(fingerprint_unlock->IsFingerprintAuthenticationAvailable());
+
+ // Strong auth becomes invalid after 1 day, and invalid strong auth makes
+ // fingerprint authentication unavailable.
+ test_api.ReduceRemainingStrongAuthTimeBy(base::TimeDelta::FromHours(24));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(fingerprint_unlock->HasStrongAuth());
+ EXPECT_FALSE(fingerprint_unlock->IsFingerprintAuthenticationAvailable());
+}
+
+} // namespace chromeos

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698