Chromium Code Reviews| Index: Source/core/dom/ContainerNode.cpp |
| diff --git a/Source/core/dom/ContainerNode.cpp b/Source/core/dom/ContainerNode.cpp |
| index 04c55d0644d5f8bbd0c86355a63720908fd59ee3..75730a2e2565a446f006b730f77f6d6310b38aee 100644 |
| --- a/Source/core/dom/ContainerNode.cpp |
| +++ b/Source/core/dom/ContainerNode.cpp |
| @@ -1034,7 +1034,7 @@ bool ContainerNode::hasRestyleFlagsInternal() const |
| void ContainerNode::setRestyleFlag(DynamicRestyleFlags mask) |
| { |
| - ASSERT(isElementNode() || isShadowRoot()); |
| + ASSERT(isElementNode() || isDocumentFragment()); |
|
esprehn
2014/05/08 05:25:11
This is wrong, we shouldn't set restyle flags in a
Inactive
2014/05/08 13:17:36
Done.
|
| ensureRareData().setRestyleFlag(mask); |
| } |