Clean up SkTypes.h.

Clean up SkTypes.h.

This change removes sk_stdint.h since it is only needed for vs2008 and earlier.
This change removes SK_MMAP_SUPPORT define since it is no longer used.
This change removes the stdio.h include from SkTypes.h since on many systems
this is a very large header, few Skia files actually use it, it is
available everywhere standard, and SkDebugf should be used instead.

After this change there is no need for external users to put Skia's
include/config into their own list of includes, saving the headache
of having two header files of the same name and sometimes getting the
wrong one depending on include order.

R=bsalomon@google.com, djsollen@google.com

Committed: https://code.google.com/p/skia/source/detail?r=11738

[djsollen, 2013-10-11 17:08:14]

WooHoo...I'm a bit fan of this change.  If you make the one change I'll be happy
to sign off.  However, since it is a public API you'll still need Mike or Brian
to do so as well.

https://codereview.chromium.org/27044002/diff/14001/samplecode/SampleDegenera...
File samplecode/SampleDegenerateTwoPtRadials.cpp (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/27044002/diff/14001/samplecode/SampleDegenera...
samplecode/SampleDegenerateTwoPtRadials.cpp:13: #include "String.h"
do you mean SkString.h?

[bungeman-skia, 2013-10-11 17:25:34]

https://codereview.chromium.org/27044002/diff/14001/samplecode/SampleDegenera...
File samplecode/SampleDegenerateTwoPtRadials.cpp (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/27044002/diff/14001/samplecode/SampleDegenera...
samplecode/SampleDegenerateTwoPtRadials.cpp:13: #include "String.h"
On 2013/10/11 17:08:15, djsollen wrote:
> do you mean SkString.h?

Done. Yes, indeed.

[djsollen, 2013-10-11 17:27:24]

lgtm, but as sheriff I would prefer you run this through most of the builder
trybots first to catch any surprises.

[bsalomon, 2013-10-11 18:07:06]

On 2013/10/11 17:27:24, djsollen wrote:
> lgtm, but as sheriff I would prefer you run this through most of the builder
> trybots first to catch any surprises.

lgtm

[bungeman-skia, 2013-10-11 18:50:53]

Committed patchset #4 manually as r11738 (presubmit successful).

[bungeman-skia, 2013-10-11 20:39:48]

On 2013/10/11 18:50:53, bungeman1 wrote:
> Committed patchset #4 manually as r11738 (presubmit successful).

Somewhat distressingly, even though all of the trybot builds were green, this
requires follow on commits r11739, r11740, r11741, r11743, r11744, and r11745.

[bungeman-skia, 2013-10-11 20:41:12]

On 2013/10/11 20:39:48, bungeman1 wrote:
> On 2013/10/11 18:50:53, bungeman1 wrote:
> > Committed patchset #4 manually as r11738 (presubmit successful).
> 
> Somewhat distressingly, even though all of the trybot builds were green, this
> requires follow on commits r11739, r11740, r11741, r11743, r11744, and r11745.

Actually, r11739 isn't technically needed for this.