Implement type variables in mixin applications.

pkg/front_end/lib/src/fasta/dill/dill_class_builder.dart

 // Copyright (c) 2016, the Dart project authors.  Please see the AUTHORS file
 // for details. All rights reserved. Use of this source code is governed by a
 // BSD-style license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
 
 library fasta.dill_class_builder;
 
 import 'package:kernel/ast.dart' show
     Class,
     Constructor,
     Member,
     Procedure,
     ProcedureKind;
 
+import '../errors.dart' show
+    internalError;
+
 import '../kernel/kernel_builder.dart' show
     Builder,
-    KernelClassBuilder;
+    KernelClassBuilder,
+    TypeBuilder;
 
 import '../modifier.dart' show
     abstractMask;
 
 import 'dill_member_builder.dart' show
     DillMemberBuilder;
 
 import 'dill_library_builder.dart' show
     DillLibraryBuilder;
 
@@ skipping 16 matching lines @@
     } else {
       DillMemberBuilder existing = members[name];
       if (existing == null) {
         members[name] = builder;
       } else {
         existing.next = builder;
       }
     }
   }
 
+  /// Returns true if this class is the result of applying a mixin to its
+  /// superclass.
+  bool get isMixinApplication => cls.isMixinApplication;

[karlklose, 2017/02/15 09:09:30]

Should this be `isMixinApplicationBuilder`?

[ahe, 2017/02/15 09:36:50]

Generally, I haven't used the Builder prefix in bool properties, for example,
see Builder. But what's your thinking behind this question?

[karlklose, 2017/02/15 09:43:57]

It made sense to me to have a prefix here to make it explicit that this is a
builder and not the thing it builds and I wasn't sure if there already is a
convention. If you did not use a prefix elsewhere, keep it as is.

+
+  TypeBuilder get mixedInType => internalError("Not implemented.");
+
   Builder findConstructorOrFactory(String name) => constructors[name];
 }
 
 int computeModifiers(Class cls) {
   return cls.isAbstract ? abstractMask : 0;
 }