| Index: cc/surfaces/surface_dependency_tracker.cc
|
| diff --git a/cc/surfaces/surface_dependency_tracker.cc b/cc/surfaces/surface_dependency_tracker.cc
|
| index df201520f458dd5f6cac01f82445d1eec440b407..d219190306ab4aa3af2eaa880ea51cbc9734f69c 100644
|
| --- a/cc/surfaces/surface_dependency_tracker.cc
|
| +++ b/cc/surfaces/surface_dependency_tracker.cc
|
| @@ -115,10 +115,9 @@ void SurfaceDependencyTracker::OnSurfaceDiscarded(Surface* surface) {
|
| pending_surfaces_.erase(surface);
|
| surface->RemoveObserver(this);
|
|
|
| - // TODO(fsamuel): We should consider removing this surface as a dependency on
|
| - // other surfaces. This dependency will be removed when the deadline hits
|
| - // anyway but maybe we should try to actiate these frames early (see
|
| - // https://crbug.com/689725).
|
| + // Pretend that the discarded surface's SurfaceId is now available to unblock
|
| + // dependencies because we now know the surface will never activate.
|
| + NotifySurfaceIdAvailable(surface->surface_id());
|
| }
|
|
|
| void SurfaceDependencyTracker::OnSurfaceActivated(Surface* surface) {
|
|
|