Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(375)

Unified Diff: src/interpreter/bytecode-generator.cc

Issue 2685683002: [async-await] (simpler) fix for Return in try/finally in async functions (Closed)
Patch Set: Created 3 years, 10 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « src/interpreter/bytecode-generator.h ('k') | src/parsing/parser.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: src/interpreter/bytecode-generator.cc
diff --git a/src/interpreter/bytecode-generator.cc b/src/interpreter/bytecode-generator.cc
index cfc45caefe82a366f30f0a3b856ebe44c6bee757..c1d3292f127730438865ab9ad1e9a071d9d7d991 100644
--- a/src/interpreter/bytecode-generator.cc
+++ b/src/interpreter/bytecode-generator.cc
@@ -706,8 +706,10 @@ void BytecodeGenerator::GenerateBytecode(uintptr_t stack_limit) {
// Emit an implicit return instruction in case control flow can fall off the
// end of the function without an explicit return being present on all paths.
if (builder()->RequiresImplicitReturn()) {
+ DCHECK(execution_control() == &control);
rmcilroy 2017/02/08 12:21:56 nit - please add a comment here that we can do a h
caitp 2017/02/08 13:42:58 Done.
builder()->LoadUndefined();
- BuildReturn();
+ BuildTraceExit();
+ builder()->Return();
}
DCHECK(!builder()->RequiresImplicitReturn());
}
@@ -1058,6 +1060,15 @@ void BytecodeGenerator::VisitBreakStatement(BreakStatement* stmt) {
void BytecodeGenerator::VisitReturnStatement(ReturnStatement* stmt) {
builder()->SetStatementPosition(stmt);
VisitForAccumulatorValue(stmt->expression());
+
+ if (stmt->is_hard_return()) {
+ // TODO(caitp): remove hard_return handling and ReturnStatement AST node
+ // flags once BytecodeGenerator performs all implicit control flow for
+ // async functions.
+ builder()->Return();
rmcilroy 2017/02/08 12:21:56 BuildTraceExit here too? How about Creating a Bui
caitp 2017/02/08 13:42:58 That looks cleaner, nice. Done
+ return;
+ }
+
execution_control()->ReturnAccumulator();
}
@@ -1991,6 +2002,31 @@ void BytecodeGenerator::BuildVariableLoadForAccumulatorValue(
}
void BytecodeGenerator::BuildReturn() {
+ if (IsAsyncFunction(info()->literal()->kind())) {
+ RegisterAllocationScope register_scope(this);
+ RegisterList args = register_allocator()->NewRegisterList(3);
+ Register receiver = args[0];
+ Register promise = args[1];
+ Register return_value = args[2];
+ builder()->StoreAccumulatorInRegister(return_value);
+
+ Variable* var_promise = scope()->promise_var();
+ DCHECK_NOT_NULL(var_promise);
+ BuildVariableLoad(var_promise, FeedbackSlot::Invalid(),
+ HoleCheckMode::kElided);
+ builder()
+ ->StoreAccumulatorInRegister(promise)
+ .LoadUndefined()
+ .StoreAccumulatorInRegister(receiver)
+ .CallJSRuntime(Context::PROMISE_RESOLVE_INDEX, args)
+ .LoadAccumulatorWithRegister(promise);
+ }
+
+ BuildTraceExit();
+ builder()->Return();
+}
+
+void BytecodeGenerator::BuildTraceExit() {
if (FLAG_trace) {
RegisterAllocationScope register_scope(this);
Register result = register_allocator()->NewRegister();
@@ -1998,7 +2034,6 @@ void BytecodeGenerator::BuildReturn() {
builder()->StoreAccumulatorInRegister(result).CallRuntime(
Runtime::kTraceExit, result);
}
- builder()->Return();
}
void BytecodeGenerator::BuildReThrow() { builder()->ReThrow(); }
« no previous file with comments | « src/interpreter/bytecode-generator.h ('k') | src/parsing/parser.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698