Remove base's ALIGNOF/ALIGNAS in favor of alignof/alignas.

base/lazy_instance_unittest.cc

Index: base/lazy_instance_unittest.cc
diff --git a/base/lazy_instance_unittest.cc b/base/lazy_instance_unittest.cc
index 8947b1291f60d54112fba0f13c72c86c9b29961a..e9d83fddb1e17b445de99d9d5bbc678f4edf610e 100644
--- a/base/lazy_instance_unittest.cc
+++ b/base/lazy_instance_unittest.cc
@@ -166,9 +166,15 @@ TEST(LazyInstanceTest, Alignment) {
   // ensure proper alignment of the static data.
   static LazyInstance<AlignedData<4> > align4 = LAZY_INSTANCE_INITIALIZER;
   static LazyInstance<AlignedData<32> > align32 = LAZY_INSTANCE_INITIALIZER;
+// GCC doesn't like alignment >64 on ARM.

[danakj, 2017/02/08 21:29:47]

Honest question is it worth testing this if nothing is using it what is the
point?

[dcheng, 2017/02/09 00:01:24]

I don't feel strongly about this; I'm happy to just remove the ifdef'd tests,
because it's really annoying to read all the conditionals.

+#if !defined(ARCH_CPU_ARM_FAMILY) || defined(__clang__)
   static LazyInstance<AlignedData<4096> > align4096 = LAZY_INSTANCE_INITIALIZER;
+#endif
 
   EXPECT_ALIGNED(align4.Pointer(), 4);
   EXPECT_ALIGNED(align32.Pointer(), 32);
+// GCC doesn't like alignment >64 on ARM.
+#if !defined(ARCH_CPU_ARM_FAMILY) || defined(__clang__)
   EXPECT_ALIGNED(align4096.Pointer(), 4096);
+#endif
 }