| Index: unittests/override_test.py
|
| diff --git a/unittests/override_test.py b/unittests/override_test.py
|
| new file mode 100755
|
| index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b0771f1f70aab2288ed1c30bdb6068a5d8260cdf
|
| --- /dev/null
|
| +++ b/unittests/override_test.py
|
| @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
|
| +#!/usr/bin/env python
|
| +# Copyright 2017 The LUCI Authors. All rights reserved.
|
| +# Use of this source code is governed under the Apache License, Version 2.0
|
| +# that can be found in the LICENSE file.
|
| +
|
| +import subprocess
|
| +import sys
|
| +import unittest
|
| +
|
| +import repo_test_util
|
| +
|
| +
|
| +class TestOverride(repo_test_util.RepoTest):
|
| + def test_simple(self):
|
| + repos = self.repo_setup({
|
| + 'a': [],
|
| + 'a1': [],
|
| + 'b': ['a'],
|
| + })
|
| +
|
| + a_c1 = self.update_recipe_module(repos['a'], 'a_module', {'foo': ['bar']})
|
| + b_c1_rev = self.update_recipes_cfg(
|
| + 'b', self.updated_package_spec_pb(repos['b'], 'a', a_c1['revision']))
|
| + b_c2 = self.update_recipe(
|
| + repos['b'], 'b_recipe', ['a/a_module'], [('a_module', 'foo')])
|
| +
|
| + # Training the recipes should work.
|
| + self.train_recipes(repos['b'])
|
| +
|
| + # Using a no-op override should also work.
|
| + self.train_recipes(repos['b'], overrides=[('a', repos['a']['root'])])
|
| +
|
| + # Using an override pointing to empty repo should fail.
|
| + with self.assertRaises(subprocess.CalledProcessError) as cm:
|
| + self.train_recipes(repos['b'], overrides=[('a', repos['a1']['root'])])
|
| + self.assertIn(
|
| + 'Exception: While generating results for \'b_recipe\': ImportError: '
|
| + 'No module named a_module',
|
| + cm.exception.output)
|
| +
|
| + def test_dependency_conflict(self):
|
| + repos = self.repo_setup({
|
| + 'a': [],
|
| + 'b': ['a'],
|
| + 'b1': ['a'],
|
| + 'c': ['a', 'b'],
|
| + })
|
| +
|
| + a_c1 = self.update_recipe_module(repos['a'], 'a_module', {'foo': ['bar']})
|
| + b_c1_rev = self.update_recipes_cfg(
|
| + 'b', self.updated_package_spec_pb(repos['b'], 'a', a_c1['revision']))
|
| + b1_c1_rev = self.update_recipes_cfg(
|
| + 'b1', self.updated_package_spec_pb(repos['b1'], 'a', a_c1['revision']))
|
| +
|
| + a_c2 = self.update_recipe_module(repos['a'], 'a_module', {'foo': ['baz']})
|
| + b_c2_rev = self.update_recipes_cfg(
|
| + 'b', self.updated_package_spec_pb(repos['b'], 'a', a_c2['revision']))
|
| +
|
| + c_spec = self.get_package_spec(repos['c'])
|
| + c_spec.deps['a'].revision = a_c2['revision']
|
| + c_spec.deps['b'].revision = b_c2_rev
|
| + c_c1 = self.update_recipes_cfg('c', c_spec.dump())
|
| +
|
| + c_c2 = self.update_recipe(
|
| + repos['c'], 'c_recipe', ['a/a_module'], [('a_module', 'foo')])
|
| +
|
| + # Training the recipes should work.
|
| + self.train_recipes(repos['c'])
|
| +
|
| + # Trying to override just the b repo should fail (conflicting revisions
|
| + # of the a repo).
|
| + with self.assertRaises(subprocess.CalledProcessError) as cm:
|
| + self.train_recipes(repos['c'], overrides=[('b', repos['b1']['root'])])
|
| + # TODO(phajdan.jr): assert on full message after making exception printable.
|
| + self.assertIn('InconsistentDependencyGraphError', cm.exception.output)
|
| +
|
| + # The solution is to also override the a repo to make it clear what revision
|
| + # should be used.
|
| + self.train_recipes(
|
| + repos['c'],
|
| + overrides=[('b', repos['b1']['root']), ('a', repos['a']['root'])])
|
| +
|
| +
|
| +if __name__ == '__main__':
|
| + sys.exit(unittest.main())
|
|
|