Rebaseline fast/text/ellipsis-with-list-marker-in-*-flow.html.

Rebaseline fast/text/ellipsis-with-list-marker-in-*-flow.html.

BUG=685851

[qyearsley, 2017-01-28 20:51:01]

Description was changed from

==========
Rebaselining fast/text/ellipsis-with-list-marker-in-*-flow.html.


Add to testexpectations

BUG=
==========

to

==========
Rebaseline fast/text/ellipsis-with-list-marker-in-*-flow.html.

BUG=685851
==========

[qyearsley, 2017-01-28 20:51:01]

qyearsley@chromium.org changed reviewers:
+ robhogan@chromium.org

[qyearsley, 2017-01-28 21:07:26]

The CQ bit was checked by qyearsley@chromium.org to run a CQ dry run

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-01-28 21:07:34]

Dry run: CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 
https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...

[qyearsley, 2017-01-28 21:28:22]

As far as I can tell, the difference between the existing and new baselines is a
minor difference in the ellipsis (spacing etc) but not in the ellipsis position.

Meanwhile, some of the lines of text for some platforms don't look exactly like
the test says it should, I think. robhogan@, could you take a look and confirm
this?

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-01-28 22:14:55]

The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-01-28 22:14:55]

Dry run: Try jobs failed on following builders:
  win_chromium_rel_ng on master.tryserver.chromium.win (JOB_FAILED,
http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.win/builders/win_chromium_rel_...)

[qyearsley, 2017-02-03 03:42:03]

On 2017/01/28 at 21:28:22, qyearsley wrote:
> As far as I can tell, the difference between the existing and new baselines is
a minor difference in the ellipsis (spacing etc) but not in the ellipsis
position.
> 
> Meanwhile, some of the lines of text for some platforms don't look exactly
like the test says it should, I think. robhogan@, could you take a look and
confirm this?

Test has non-deterministic output, not just in need of new baselines.

See http://crbug.com/663855.