Update clang-format binaries and scripts for all platforms (take 2).

Update clang-format binaries and scripts for all platforms (take 2).

This time, with valid script/ SHA1!

I followed these instructions:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/updating_clang_format_binaries.md

The binaries were built at clang revision 290930 on Wed Jan 25 19:54:51 PST 2017

BUG=567770
R=thakis@chromium.org

Committed: c302711306f19ec9d29ac3461b09ecd4c781fac0

[Dan Beam, 2017-01-27 02:30:06]

https://codereview.chromium.org/2656293002/diff/1/DEPS
File DEPS (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/2656293002/diff/1/DEPS#newcode6
DEPS:6: "clang_format_rev": "4be7a6c06697b4300179feccfb49be43a0f8d3df", #
r289428
note: I think this is correct, but r289428 is the git-svn-id of
4be7a6c06697b4300179feccfb49be43a0f8d3df here:

https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/llvm-project/cfe/tools/clang-forma...

whereas the binary was built at a different rev (which it says when you pass
--version)

[Dan Beam, 2017-01-27 02:31:09]

Description was changed from

==========
Update clang-format binaries and scripts for all platforms (take 2).

This time, with valid tools SHA1!

I followed these instructions:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/updating_clang_f...

The binaries were built at clang revision 290930 on Wed Jan 25 19:54:51 PST 2017

BUG=567770
R=thakis@chromium.org
==========

to

==========
Update clang-format binaries and scripts for all platforms (take 2).

This time, with valid script/ SHA1!

I followed these instructions:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/updating_clang_f...

The binaries were built at clang revision 290930 on Wed Jan 25 19:54:51 PST 2017

BUG=567770
R=thakis@chromium.org
==========

[Nico, 2017-01-27 02:35:27]

lgtm

(For relands, I usually upload the original change as patch set 1 and the
changed one as ps2 so that it's easy to see what changed)

https://codereview.chromium.org/2656293002/diff/1/DEPS
File DEPS (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/2656293002/diff/1/DEPS#newcode6
DEPS:6: "clang_format_rev": "4be7a6c06697b4300179feccfb49be43a0f8d3df", #
r289428
On 2017/01/27 02:30:06, Dan Beam wrote:
> note: I think this is correct, but r289428 is the git-svn-id of
> 4be7a6c06697b4300179feccfb49be43a0f8d3df here:
> 
>
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/llvm-project/cfe/tools/clang-forma...
> 
> whereas the binary was built at a different rev (which it says when you pass
> --version)

I'd still say "#r290930" here (the scripts didn't change between 289428 and
290930 so it's the same, and imho it's better for this to match the other rev #,
but up to you)

[Dan Beam, 2017-01-27 02:39:46]

https://codereview.chromium.org/2656293002/diff/1/DEPS
File DEPS (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/2656293002/diff/1/DEPS#newcode6
DEPS:6: "clang_format_rev": "4be7a6c06697b4300179feccfb49be43a0f8d3df", #
r289428
On 2017/01/27 02:35:27, Nico wrote:
> On 2017/01/27 02:30:06, Dan Beam wrote:
> > note: I think this is correct, but r289428 is the git-svn-id of
> > 4be7a6c06697b4300179feccfb49be43a0f8d3df here:
> > 
> >
>
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/llvm-project/cfe/tools/clang-forma...
> > 
> > whereas the binary was built at a different rev (which it says when you pass
> > --version)
> 
> I'd still say "#r290930" here (the scripts didn't change between 289428 and
> 290930 so it's the same, and imho it's better for this to match the other rev
#,
> but up to you)

the previous rev is the SHA1 and corresponding git-svn-id, that's why I did this
as well

https://codereview.chromium.org/2656293002/diff/1/linux64/clang-format.sha1
File linux64/clang-format.sha1 (left):

https://codereview.chromium.org/2656293002/diff/1/linux64/clang-format.sha1#o...
linux64/clang-format.sha1:1: 8f37fe78cc478600761211413e4974ceef94501d
fwiw, I just downloaded this binary and ran --version and it gave me r282138,
which doesn't match the tools sha1 + git-svn-id

[Nico, 2017-01-27 02:42:59]

As I said, up to you. As-is is fine if you like that better.

https://codereview.chromium.org/2656293002/diff/1/clang_format/README.chromium
File clang_format/README.chromium (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/2656293002/diff/1/clang_format/README.chromiu...
clang_format/README.chromium:6: Revision: See DEPS
I guess this is a lie then :-)

[Dan Beam, 2017-01-27 02:43:21]

Description was changed from

==========
Update clang-format binaries and scripts for all platforms (take 2).

This time, with valid script/ SHA1!

I followed these instructions:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/updating_clang_f...

The binaries were built at clang revision 290930 on Wed Jan 25 19:54:51 PST 2017

BUG=567770
R=thakis@chromium.org
==========

to

==========
Update clang-format binaries and scripts for all platforms (take 2).

This time, with valid script/ SHA1!

I followed these instructions:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/updating_clang_f...

The binaries were built at clang revision 290930 on Wed Jan 25 19:54:51 PST 2017

BUG=567770
R=thakis@chromium.org

Committed: c302711306f19ec9d29ac3461b09ecd4c781fac0
==========

[Dan Beam, 2017-01-27 02:43:22]

Committed patchset #1 (id:1) manually as
c302711306f19ec9d29ac3461b09ecd4c781fac0 (presubmit successful).