Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(665)

Unified Diff: cc/trees/layer_tree_impl_unittest.cc

Issue 2655233006: cc : Clean up cc clip tree (Closed)
Patch Set: rebase Created 3 years, 9 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « cc/trees/layer_tree_impl.cc ('k') | cc/trees/layer_tree_settings.h » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: cc/trees/layer_tree_impl_unittest.cc
diff --git a/cc/trees/layer_tree_impl_unittest.cc b/cc/trees/layer_tree_impl_unittest.cc
index d25530103e99f5c2b36917cefd2e0de6d476a505..3b0cbeec66371a3212dfb877d0752c6364c65618 100644
--- a/cc/trees/layer_tree_impl_unittest.cc
+++ b/cc/trees/layer_tree_impl_unittest.cc
@@ -10,7 +10,6 @@
#include "cc/test/fake_layer_tree_host_impl.h"
#include "cc/test/geometry_test_utils.h"
#include "cc/test/layer_test_common.h"
-#include "cc/test/layer_tree_settings_for_testing.h"
#include "cc/trees/clip_node.h"
#include "cc/trees/draw_property_utils.h"
#include "cc/trees/layer_tree_host_common.h"
@@ -22,7 +21,7 @@
namespace cc {
namespace {
-class LayerTreeImplTestSettings : public LayerTreeSettingsForTesting {
+class LayerTreeImplTestSettings : public LayerTreeSettings {
public:
LayerTreeImplTestSettings() {
layer_transforms_should_scale_layer_contents = true;
@@ -41,9 +40,7 @@ class LayerTreeImplTest : public testing::Test {
return host_impl().active_tree()->RenderSurfaceLayerList();
}
- void ExecuteCalculateDrawProperties(
- LayerImpl* root_layer,
- bool skip_verify_visible_rect_calculations = false) {
+ void ExecuteCalculateDrawProperties(LayerImpl* root_layer) {
// We are probably not testing what is intended if the root_layer bounds are
// empty.
DCHECK(!root_layer->bounds().IsEmpty());
@@ -52,8 +49,6 @@ class LayerTreeImplTest : public testing::Test {
LayerTreeHostCommon::CalcDrawPropsImplInputsForTesting inputs(
root_layer, root_layer->bounds(), &render_surface_layer_list_impl_);
inputs.can_adjust_raster_scales = true;
- if (skip_verify_visible_rect_calculations)
- inputs.verify_visible_rect_calculations = false;
LayerTreeHostCommon::CalculateDrawPropertiesForTesting(&inputs);
}
@@ -247,14 +242,7 @@ TEST_F(LayerTreeImplTest, HitTestingForUninvertibleTransform) {
root->SetDrawsContent(true);
host_impl().SetViewportSize(root->bounds());
- // While computing visible rects by combining clips in screen space, we set
- // the entire layer as visible if the screen space transform is singular. This
- // is not always true when we combine clips in target space because if the
- // intersection of combined_clip in taret space with layer_rect projected to
- // target space is empty, we set it to an empty rect.
- bool skip_verify_visible_rect_calculations = true;
- host_impl().UpdateNumChildrenAndDrawPropertiesForActiveTree(
- skip_verify_visible_rect_calculations);
+ host_impl().UpdateNumChildrenAndDrawPropertiesForActiveTree();
// Sanity check the scenario we just created.
ASSERT_EQ(1u, RenderSurfaceLayerList().size());
ASSERT_EQ(1u, root_layer()->GetRenderSurface()->layer_list().size());
@@ -441,10 +429,6 @@ TEST_F(LayerTreeImplTest, HitTestingClipNodeDifferentTransformAndTargetIds) {
host_impl().active_tree()->FindLayerThatIsHitByPoint(test_point);
ASSERT_TRUE(result_layer);
EXPECT_EQ(5, result_layer->id());
-
- ClipTree& clip_tree = host_impl().active_tree()->property_trees()->clip_tree;
- ClipNode* clip_node = clip_tree.Node(result_layer->clip_tree_index());
- EXPECT_NE(clip_node->transform_id, clip_node->target_transform_id);
}
TEST_F(LayerTreeImplTest, HitTestingSiblings) {
@@ -637,7 +621,6 @@ TEST_F(LayerTreeImplTest, HitTestingForMultiClippedRotatedLayer) {
// Visible rects computed by combinig clips in target space and root space
// don't match because of rotation transforms. So, we skip
// verify_visible_rect_calculations.
- bool skip_verify_visible_rect_calculations = true;
{
std::unique_ptr<LayerImpl> child =
LayerImpl::Create(host_impl().active_tree(), 456);
@@ -677,12 +660,11 @@ TEST_F(LayerTreeImplTest, HitTestingForMultiClippedRotatedLayer) {
child->test_properties()->AddChild(std::move(grand_child));
root->test_properties()->AddChild(std::move(child));
- ExecuteCalculateDrawProperties(root, skip_verify_visible_rect_calculations);
+ ExecuteCalculateDrawProperties(root);
}
host_impl().SetViewportSize(root->bounds());
- host_impl().UpdateNumChildrenAndDrawPropertiesForActiveTree(
- skip_verify_visible_rect_calculations);
+ host_impl().UpdateNumChildrenAndDrawPropertiesForActiveTree();
// (11, 89) is close to the the bottom left corner within the clip, but it is
// not inside the layer.
gfx::PointF test_point(11.f, 89.f);
@@ -1343,14 +1325,7 @@ TEST_F(LayerTreeImplTest,
root->SetTouchEventHandlerRegion(touch_handler_region);
host_impl().SetViewportSize(root->bounds());
- // While computing visible rects by combining clips in screen space, we set
- // the entire layer as visible if the screen space transform is singular. This
- // is not always true when we combine clips in target space because if the
- // intersection of combined_clip in taret space with layer_rect projected to
- // target space is empty, we set it to an empty rect.
- bool skip_verify_visible_rect_calculations = true;
- host_impl().UpdateNumChildrenAndDrawPropertiesForActiveTree(
- skip_verify_visible_rect_calculations);
+ host_impl().UpdateNumChildrenAndDrawPropertiesForActiveTree();
// Sanity check the scenario we just created.
ASSERT_EQ(1u, RenderSurfaceLayerList().size());
« no previous file with comments | « cc/trees/layer_tree_impl.cc ('k') | cc/trees/layer_tree_settings.h » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698