Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(1318)

Unified Diff: content/child/service_worker/service_worker_dispatcher.cc

Issue 26442004: Service worker registration error support (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src
Patch Set: Review nits Created 7 years, 2 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: content/child/service_worker/service_worker_dispatcher.cc
diff --git a/content/child/service_worker/service_worker_dispatcher.cc b/content/child/service_worker/service_worker_dispatcher.cc
index 866b25e5870ef90254f7b5537be765fd32b7715b..c4f0795fe0dd506fe204d03439eba8f6008bf9c9 100644
--- a/content/child/service_worker/service_worker_dispatcher.cc
+++ b/content/child/service_worker/service_worker_dispatcher.cc
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
#include "content/common/service_worker_messages.h"
#include "third_party/WebKit/public/web/WebSecurityOrigin.h"
+using WebKit::WebServiceWorkerError;
using WebKit::WebServiceWorkerProvider;
using base::ThreadLocalPointer;
using webkit_glue::WorkerTaskRunner;
@@ -44,10 +45,11 @@ ServiceWorkerDispatcher::~ServiceWorkerDispatcher() {
void ServiceWorkerDispatcher::OnMessageReceived(const IPC::Message& msg) {
bool handled = true;
IPC_BEGIN_MESSAGE_MAP(ServiceWorkerDispatcher, msg)
- IPC_MESSAGE_HANDLER(ServiceWorkerMsg_ServiceWorkerRegistered,
- OnServiceWorkerRegistered)
+ IPC_MESSAGE_HANDLER(ServiceWorkerMsg_ServiceWorkerRegistered, OnRegistered)
IPC_MESSAGE_HANDLER(ServiceWorkerMsg_ServiceWorkerUnregistered,
- OnServiceWorkerUnregistered)
+ OnUnregistered)
+ IPC_MESSAGE_HANDLER(ServiceWorkerMsg_ServiceWorkerRegistrationError,
+ OnRegistrationError)
IPC_MESSAGE_UNHANDLED(handled = false)
IPC_END_MESSAGE_MAP()
DCHECK(handled) << "Unhandled message:" << msg.type();
@@ -92,7 +94,7 @@ ServiceWorkerDispatcher* ServiceWorkerDispatcher::ThreadSpecificInstance(
return dispatcher;
}
-void ServiceWorkerDispatcher::OnServiceWorkerRegistered(
+void ServiceWorkerDispatcher::OnRegistered(
int32 thread_id,
int32 request_id,
int64 service_worker_id) {
@@ -114,7 +116,7 @@ void ServiceWorkerDispatcher::OnServiceWorkerRegistered(
pending_callbacks_.Remove(request_id);
}
-void ServiceWorkerDispatcher::OnServiceWorkerUnregistered(
+void ServiceWorkerDispatcher::OnUnregistered(
int32 thread_id,
int32 request_id) {
WebServiceWorkerProvider::WebServiceWorkerCallbacks* callbacks =
@@ -127,6 +129,23 @@ void ServiceWorkerDispatcher::OnServiceWorkerUnregistered(
pending_callbacks_.Remove(request_id);
}
+void ServiceWorkerDispatcher::OnRegistrationError(
+ int32 thread_id,
+ int32 request_id,
+ WebServiceWorkerError::ErrorType error_type,
+ string16 message) {
+ WebServiceWorkerProvider::WebServiceWorkerCallbacks* callbacks =
+ pending_callbacks_.Lookup(request_id);
+ DCHECK(callbacks);
+ if (!callbacks)
michaeln 2013/10/25 21:41:25 do we need the test for !callback?
alecflett 2013/10/25 23:41:56 We've needed to do this for security reasons in ID
michaeln 2013/10/26 00:41:01 that makes good sense to me in the browser process
alecflett 2013/10/28 17:03:14 Agreed that it's certainly much safer in the brows
+ return;
+
+ scoped_ptr<WebServiceWorkerError> error(
+ new WebServiceWorkerError(error_type, message));
+ callbacks->onError(error.release());
+ pending_callbacks_.Remove(request_id);
+}
+
void ServiceWorkerDispatcher::OnWorkerRunLoopStopped() { delete this; }
} // namespace content

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698