| Index: cc/tiles/picture_layer_tiling_unittest.cc
|
| diff --git a/cc/tiles/picture_layer_tiling_unittest.cc b/cc/tiles/picture_layer_tiling_unittest.cc
|
| index a861e87dbb4fefd539203087902593176cb86aa9..147f836a5974171a3951cb7ebbde6dea00928981 100644
|
| --- a/cc/tiles/picture_layer_tiling_unittest.cc
|
| +++ b/cc/tiles/picture_layer_tiling_unittest.cc
|
| @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ class TestablePictureLayerTiling : public PictureLayerTiling {
|
| float min_preraster_distance,
|
| float max_preraster_distance)
|
| : PictureLayerTiling(tree,
|
| - gfx::SizeF(contents_scale, contents_scale),
|
| + contents_scale,
|
| raster_source,
|
| client,
|
| min_preraster_distance,
|
| @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ class PictureLayerTilingIteratorTest : public testing::Test {
|
| // tiling scale. This is because coverage computation is done in integer
|
| // grids in the dest space, and the overlap between tiles may not guarantee
|
| // to enclose an integer grid line to round to if scaled down.
|
| - ASSERT_GE(rect_scale, tiling_->contents_scale_key());
|
| + ASSERT_GE(rect_scale, tiling_->contents_scale());
|
|
|
| Region remaining = expect_rect;
|
| for (PictureLayerTiling::CoverageIterator
|
| @@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ class PictureLayerTilingIteratorTest : public testing::Test {
|
|
|
| void VerifyTilesCoverNonContainedRect(float rect_scale,
|
| const gfx::Rect& dest_rect) {
|
| - float dest_to_contents_scale = tiling_->contents_scale_key() / rect_scale;
|
| + float dest_to_contents_scale = tiling_->contents_scale() / rect_scale;
|
| gfx::Rect clamped_rect = gfx::ScaleToEnclosingRect(
|
| gfx::Rect(tiling_->tiling_size()), 1.f / dest_to_contents_scale);
|
| clamped_rect.Intersect(dest_rect);
|
|
|