LayoutTests/animations/interpolation/background-position-interpolation-expected.txt - Issue 26247003: Web Animations CSS: Support animation of background-position and background-image

Unified Diff: LayoutTests/animations/interpolation/background-position-interpolation-expected.txt

Issue 26247003: Web Animations CSS: Support animation of background-position and background-image (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/blink/trunk

Patch Set: Created 7 years, 2 months ago

Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.

Jump to:

View side-by-side diff with in-line comments

Download patch

« LayoutTests/animations/interpolation/background-position-interpolation.html ('K') | « LayoutTests/animations/interpolation/background-position-interpolation.html ('k') | LayoutTests/virtual/web-animations-css/animations/interpolation/background-position-interpolation-expected.txt » ('j') | Source/core/animation/AnimatableRepeatable.h » ('J')
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Hide Comments ('s')

Index: LayoutTests/animations/interpolation/background-position-interpolation-expected.txt

diff --git a/LayoutTests/animations/interpolation/background-position-interpolation-expected.txt b/LayoutTests/animations/interpolation/background-position-interpolation-expected.txt

new file mode 100644

index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..944f9c8abddbf980a8f8269d4949e433f94569a4

--- /dev/null

+++ b/LayoutTests/animations/interpolation/background-position-interpolation-expected.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@

+FAIL: background-position from [0px 0px, 80px 0px] to [40px 40px, 80px 80px, 0px 80px] was [-10px -10px, 80px -20px, 0px -20px, 0% 0%] at -0.25, expected [-10px -10px, 80px -20px, 0px -20px, 90px -10px]

dstockwell 2013/10/08 22:52:05 change description should explain why these are fa

alancutter (OOO until 2018) 2013/10/09 07:20:55 Done.

+FAIL: background-position from [0px 0px, 80px 0px] to [40px 40px, 80px 80px, 0px 80px] was [0px 0px, 80px 0px, 0px 0px, 0% 0%] at 0, expected [0px 0px, 80px 0px, 0px 0px, 80px 0px]

+FAIL: background-position from [0px 0px, 80px 0px] to [40px 40px, 80px 80px, 0px 80px] was [10px 10px, 80px 20px, 0px 20px, 0% 0%] at 0.25, expected [10px 10px, 80px 20px, 0px 20px, 70px 10px]

+FAIL: background-position from [0px 0px, 80px 0px] to [40px 40px, 80px 80px, 0px 80px] was [20px 20px, 80px 40px, 0px 40px, 0% 0%] at 0.5, expected [20px 20px, 80px 40px, 0px 40px, 60px 20px]

+FAIL: background-position from [0px 0px, 80px 0px] to [40px 40px, 80px 80px, 0px 80px] was [30px 30px, 80px 60px, 0px 60px, 0% 0%] at 0.75, expected [30px 30px, 80px 60px, 0px 60px, 50px 30px]

+FAIL: background-position from [0px 0px, 80px 0px] to [40px 40px, 80px 80px, 0px 80px] was [40px 40px, 80px 80px, 0px 80px, 0% 0%] at 1, expected [40px 40px, 80px 80px, 0px 80px, 40px 40px]

+FAIL: background-position from [0px 0px, 80px 0px] to [40px 40px, 80px 80px, 0px 80px] was [50px 50px, 80px 100px, 0px 100px, 0% 0%] at 1.25, expected [50px 50px, 80px 100px, 0px 100px, 30px 50px]

Steve Block 2013/10/08 23:21:49 Can you mention in the description what's so broke

alancutter (OOO until 2018) 2013/10/09 07:20:55 Done.