Chromium Code Reviews| Index: content/browser/loader/async_resource_handler.cc |
| diff --git a/content/browser/loader/async_resource_handler.cc b/content/browser/loader/async_resource_handler.cc |
| index d55bc0f9a72c14c08eeacd3c26729415dee696b6..bcfd5fddaff5da140b86ffabd7e1a3c96c3e7a41 100644 |
| --- a/content/browser/loader/async_resource_handler.cc |
| +++ b/content/browser/loader/async_resource_handler.cc |
| @@ -72,6 +72,13 @@ void InitializeResourceBufferConstants() { |
| GetNumericArg("resource-buffer-max-allocation-size", &kMaxAllocationSize); |
| } |
| +enum ExpectedContentSize { |
|
mmenke
2017/01/11 20:25:19
"enum class" should generally be preferred to just
maksims (do not use this acc)
2017/01/12 09:03:03
invalid operands to binary expression ('content::(
mmenke
2017/01/12 18:04:10
Ah, right, good point.
|
| + CORRESPONDS_TO_RESPONSE_BODY = 0, |
|
mmenke
2017/01/11 20:25:20
EQ_RESPONSE_BODY?
maksims (do not use this acc)
2017/01/13 12:05:18
Done.
|
| + LT_RESPONSE_BODY = 1, |
| + MT_RESPONSE_BODY = 2, |
| + EXPECTED_CONTENT_SIZE, |
|
mmenke
2017/01/11 20:25:19
nit: EXPECTED_CONTENT_MAX is more common
maksims (do not use this acc)
2017/01/13 12:05:17
Done.
|
| +}; |
| + |
| } // namespace |
| // Used when kOptimizeLoadingIPCForSmallResources is enabled. |
| @@ -199,6 +206,7 @@ AsyncResourceHandler::AsyncResourceHandler( |
| rdh_(rdh), |
| pending_data_count_(0), |
| allocation_size_(0), |
| + total_read_bytes_(0), |
| did_defer_(false), |
| has_checked_for_sufficient_resources_(false), |
| sent_received_response_msg_(false), |
| @@ -395,6 +403,8 @@ bool AsyncResourceHandler::OnReadCompleted(int bytes_read, bool* defer) { |
| buffer_->ShrinkLastAllocation(bytes_read); |
| + total_read_bytes_ += bytes_read; |
| + |
| if (!sent_data_buffer_msg_) { |
| base::SharedMemoryHandle handle = base::SharedMemory::DuplicateHandle( |
| buffer_->GetSharedMemory().handle()); |
| @@ -551,6 +561,42 @@ void AsyncResourceHandler::RecordHistogram() { |
| } |
| inlining_helper_->RecordHistogram(elapsed_time); |
| + |
| + // Record if content size is known in advance. |
|
mmenke
2017/01/11 20:25:20
nit: is -> was (Since this is recorded at the end
maksims (do not use this acc)
2017/01/13 12:05:18
Done.
|
| + int64_t expected_content_size = request()->GetExpectedContentSize(); |
| + if (expected_content_size > 0) { |
|
mmenke
2017/01/11 20:25:19
nit: >= 0 (We use -1 to mean unknown, 0 means the
maksims (do not use this acc)
2017/01/13 12:05:17
Done.
|
| + UMA_HISTOGRAM_BOOLEAN( |
| + "Net.ResourceLoader.ExpectedContentSize.IsKnown", |
| + true); |
| + // Compare response body size to expected content size. |
| + if (expected_content_size == total_read_bytes_) { |
|
mmenke
2017/01/11 20:25:19
Should we separate out those where expected_conten
maksims (do not use this acc)
2017/01/12 09:03:02
Do you think I should add another enum entry, whic
mmenke
2017/01/12 18:04:10
I'm fine with that. I'm not sure how much it gets
maksims (do not use this acc)
2017/01/13 12:05:17
Done.
|
| + UMA_HISTOGRAM_ENUMERATION( |
|
mmenke
2017/01/11 20:25:19
These UMA_HISTOGRAM_ENUMERATION are deceivingly ex
maksims (do not use this acc)
2017/01/13 12:05:18
I see. Do you think I should use something else?
mmenke
2017/01/13 16:01:36
No, but you should only have one instance of "UMA_
|
| + "Net.ResourceLoader.ExpectedContentSize.CorrespondsBodySize", |
| + ExpectedContentSize::CORRESPONDS_TO_RESPONSE_BODY, |
| + ExpectedContentSize::EXPECTED_CONTENT_SIZE); |
| + } else if (expected_content_size < total_read_bytes_) { |
| + UMA_HISTOGRAM_ENUMERATION( |
| + "Net.ResourceLoader.ExpectedContentSize.CorrespondsBodySize", |
| + ExpectedContentSize::LT_RESPONSE_BODY, |
| + ExpectedContentSize::EXPECTED_CONTENT_SIZE); |
| + } else { |
| + UMA_HISTOGRAM_ENUMERATION( |
| + "Net.ResourceLoader.ExpectedContentSize.CorrespondsBodySize", |
| + ExpectedContentSize::MT_RESPONSE_BODY, |
| + ExpectedContentSize::EXPECTED_CONTENT_SIZE); |
| + } |
| + } else { |
| + UMA_HISTOGRAM_BOOLEAN( |
| + "Net.ResourceLoader.ExpectedContentSize.IsKnown", |
| + false); |
|
mmenke
2017/01/11 20:25:19
Do we really need two histograms? Seems like we c
maksims (do not use this acc)
2017/01/12 09:03:03
sounds reasonable.
maksims (do not use this acc)
2017/01/13 12:05:17
Done.
|
| + } |
| + |
| + // Record how many times total size of read body is less or more/eq than |
| + // buffer. |
| + UMA_HISTOGRAM_BOOLEAN( |
| + "Net.ResourceLoader.TotalBodySize.LT_AsyncHandlerBufferSize", |
| + total_read_bytes_ < kBufferSize); |
|
mmenke
2017/01/11 20:25:20
I don't think we need this - can just add up the v
maksims (do not use this acc)
2017/01/12 09:03:02
But we'll loose data, which tells us how accurate
mmenke
2017/01/12 18:04:10
Sorry, I wasn't clear. I mean keep them as separa
|
| + total_read_bytes_ = 0; |
| } |
| void AsyncResourceHandler::SendUploadProgress(int64_t current_position, |