Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(1748)

Unified Diff: cc/layers/picture_layer_impl.cc

Issue 260963008: Fixing crash in PictureLayerImpl::MarkVisibleResourcesAsRequired when low-res tiles are disabled (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: Remaking if condition Created 6 years, 7 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « no previous file | cc/layers/picture_layer_impl_unittest.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: cc/layers/picture_layer_impl.cc
diff --git a/cc/layers/picture_layer_impl.cc b/cc/layers/picture_layer_impl.cc
index 85249812d5fbc9d5ea119537e014ae5e80eb80b2..13f95a9f5da73e23a580a67ee6f65b96c88eff73 100644
--- a/cc/layers/picture_layer_impl.cc
+++ b/cc/layers/picture_layer_impl.cc
@@ -787,19 +787,26 @@ void PictureLayerImpl::MarkVisibleResourcesAsRequired() const {
const PictureLayerTiling* twin_low_res = NULL;
// As a simplification, only allow activating to skip twin tiles that the
- // active layer is also missing when both this layer and its twin have 2
- // tilings (high and low). This avoids having to iterate/track coverage of
- // non-ideal tilings during the last draw call on the active layer.
- if (high_res && low_res && tilings_->num_tilings() == 2 &&
- twin_layer_ && twin_layer_->tilings_->num_tilings() == 2) {
- twin_low_res = GetTwinTiling(low_res);
- if (twin_low_res)
+ // active layer is also missing when both this layer and its twin have
+ // "simple" sets of tilings: only 2 tilings (high and low) for case, when low
+ // res is enabled; or only 1 high res tiling, when low res is disabled. This
+ // avoids having to iterate/track coverage of non-ideal tilings during the
+ // last draw call on the active layer.
+ bool should_have_low_res = ShouldHaveLowResTiling();
+ int num_tilings = tilings_->num_tilings();
+ if ((high_res && low_res && num_tilings == 2 ||
+ high_res && !should_have_low_res && num_tilings == 1) &&
Sergey 2014/05/16 02:26:13 How about this one, did it get any better?... Or p
+ twin_layer_ && num_tilings == twin_layer_->tilings_->num_tilings()) {
+ if (should_have_low_res)
+ twin_low_res = GetTwinTiling(low_res);
+ if (twin_low_res || !should_have_low_res)
twin_high_res = GetTwinTiling(high_res);
}
+
// If this layer and its twin have different transforms, then don't compare
// them and only allow activating to high res tiles, since tiles on each layer
// will be in different places on screen.
- if (!twin_high_res || !twin_low_res ||
+ if (!twin_high_res || (!twin_low_res && should_have_low_res) ||
twin_layer_->layer_tree_impl()->RequiresHighResToDraw() ||
draw_properties().screen_space_transform !=
twin_layer_->draw_properties().screen_space_transform) {
@@ -814,9 +821,11 @@ void PictureLayerImpl::MarkVisibleResourcesAsRequired() const {
// As an optional third pass, if a high res tile was skipped because its
// twin was also missing, then fall back to mark low res tiles as required
// in case the active twin is substituting those for missing high res
- // content.
- MarkVisibleTilesAsRequired(
- low_res, twin_low_res, contents_scale_x(), rect, missing_region);
+ // content. Only suitable, when low res is enabled.
+ if (should_have_low_res) {
+ MarkVisibleTilesAsRequired(
+ low_res, twin_low_res, contents_scale_x(), rect, missing_region);
+ }
}
}
« no previous file with comments | « no previous file | cc/layers/picture_layer_impl_unittest.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698