Remove ForceReclaimResources

cc/surfaces/direct_compositor_frame_sink_unittest.cc

Index: cc/surfaces/direct_compositor_frame_sink_unittest.cc
diff --git a/cc/surfaces/direct_compositor_frame_sink_unittest.cc b/cc/surfaces/direct_compositor_frame_sink_unittest.cc
index 1a6e1582f16d4fdf03601351c59c775bf9438b76..87347c0eace7e8060ea31e95ef1161a187104397 100644
--- a/cc/surfaces/direct_compositor_frame_sink_unittest.cc
+++ b/cc/surfaces/direct_compositor_frame_sink_unittest.cc
@@ -139,7 +139,6 @@ TEST_F(DirectCompositorFrameSinkTest, SuspendedDoesNotTriggerSwapBuffers) {
 
 TEST_F(DirectCompositorFrameSinkTest,
        LockingResourcesDoesNotIndirectlyCauseDamage) {

[danakj, 2017/01/04 18:43:38]

It looks like you can remove this test, it's now identical to
NoDamageDoesNotTriggerSwapBuffers?

[ericrk, 2017/01/11 19:17:54]

Ah yeah, looks like it. That first part isn't really doing much.

-  compositor_frame_sink_->ForceReclaimResources();
   EXPECT_EQ(1u, display_output_surface_->num_sent_frames());
   task_runner_->RunPendingTasks();
   EXPECT_EQ(1u, display_output_surface_->num_sent_frames());