Index: third_party/protobuf/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf.Test/ByteStringTest.cs |
diff --git a/third_party/protobuf/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf.Test/ByteStringTest.cs b/third_party/protobuf/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf.Test/ByteStringTest.cs |
index 3ba8df6471f2f56925693dac0881b64f48c78b7e..8935b7829d4a95a703362b5eb317223ef66ae0b8 100644 |
--- a/third_party/protobuf/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf.Test/ByteStringTest.cs |
+++ b/third_party/protobuf/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf.Test/ByteStringTest.cs |
@@ -167,18 +167,5 @@ namespace Google.Protobuf |
// Optimization which also fixes issue 61. |
Assert.AreSame(ByteString.Empty, ByteString.FromBase64("")); |
} |
- |
- [Test] |
- public void GetHashCode_Regression() |
- { |
- // We used to have an awful hash algorithm where only the last four |
- // bytes were relevant. This is a regression test for |
- // https://github.com/google/protobuf/issues/2511 |
- |
- ByteString b1 = ByteString.CopyFrom(100, 1, 2, 3, 4); |
- ByteString b2 = ByteString.CopyFrom(200, 1, 2, 3, 4); |
- Assert.AreNotEqual(b1.GetHashCode(), b2.GetHashCode()); |
- } |
- |
} |
} |