Initialize devil_chromium when in chromium checkout.

Initialize devil_chromium when in chromium checkout.

Runs devil_chromium.Initialize(...) if devil_chromium module is
injected, if not - fall back to devil_env.config.Initialize(...)

Lets telemetry work with locally built architectures, but only
through chromium checkout.

BUG=chromium:669849

[djordje.golubovic, 2016-12-21 17:54:59]

Description was changed from

==========
Initialize devil_chromium when in chromium checkout.

Runs devil_chromium.Initialize(...) if devil_chromium module is
injected, if not - fall back to devil_env.config.Initialize(...)

Lets telemetry work with locally built architectures, but only
through chromium checkout.

BUG=chromium:669849
==========

to

==========
Initialize devil_chromium when in chromium checkout.

Runs devil_chromium.Initialize(...) if devil_chromium module is
injected, if not - fall back to devil_env.config.Initialize(...)

Lets telemetry work with locally built architectures, but only
through chromium checkout.

BUG=chromium:669849
==========

[djordje.golubovic, 2016-12-21 17:54:59]

djordje.golubovic@imgtec.com changed reviewers:
+ aiolos@chromium.org, gordana.cmiljanovic@imgtec.com, jbudorick@chromium.org,
petar.jovanovic@imgtec.com

[djordje.golubovic, 2016-12-21 17:56:09]

djordje.golubovic@imgtec.com changed reviewers:
- gordana.cmiljanovic@imgtec.com, petar.jovanovic@imgtec.com

[djordje.golubovic, 2016-12-21 18:00:16]

Please take a look

[jbudorick, 2016-12-21 18:05:10]

As mentioned in the other review, I'd prefer the other solution.

[djordje.golubovic, 2016-12-21 18:38:59]

On 2016/12/21 18:05:10, jbudorick wrote:
> As mentioned in the other review, I'd prefer the other solution.

My mistake, I've misread.

Posted another patch set to the other review, if you could take a look, please.
https://codereview.chromium.org/2573913002

[jbudorick, 2016-12-21 18:41:15]

On 2016/12/21 18:38:59, djordje.golubovic wrote:
> On 2016/12/21 18:05:10, jbudorick wrote:
> > As mentioned in the other review, I'd prefer the other solution.
> 
> My mistake, I've misread.

No, I don't think you did; I just think we're still kind of working through the
appropriate solution here.

> 
> Posted another patch set to the other review, if you could take a look,
please.
> https://codereview.chromium.org/2573913002