Index: third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/animations/animation-direction-reverse-timing-functions.html |
diff --git a/third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/animations/animation-direction-reverse-timing-functions.html b/third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/animations/animation-direction-reverse-timing-functions.html |
index 57a075d1dc79f03bcf0ed80845035d1ca74b6136..5a5e779d13b9016a46f98f103df52a2275927d46 100644 |
--- a/third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/animations/animation-direction-reverse-timing-functions.html |
+++ b/third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/animations/animation-direction-reverse-timing-functions.html |
@@ -1,28 +1,21 @@ |
-<!doctype html> |
-<html lang="en"> |
-<head> |
- <title>Test of animation-direction timing functions</title> |
- <style> |
- body { |
- margin: 0; |
- } |
- |
+<!DOCTYPE html> |
+<title>Test of animation-direction timing functions</title> |
+<script src="../resources/testharness.js"></script> |
+<script src="../resources/testharnessreport.js"></script> |
+<style> |
.box { |
- position: relative; |
- left: 20px; |
- top: 10px; |
- height: 50px; |
- width: 250px; |
- margin-bottom: 10px; |
animation-duration: 2s; |
- animation-timing-function: ease; /* ease is good for testing because it is not symmetric */ |
animation-iteration-count: 4; |
- } |
- |
- .move1 { |
animation-name: move1; |
+ animation-timing-function: ease; /* ease is good for testing because it is not symmetric */ |
background-color: blue; |
color: white; |
+ height: 50px; |
+ left: 20px; |
+ margin-bottom: 10px; |
+ position: relative; |
+ top: 10px; |
+ width: 250px; |
} |
.normal { |
@@ -45,31 +38,37 @@ |
from { left: 0px; } |
to { left: 200px; } |
} |
- </style> |
- <script src="resources/animation-test-helpers.js"></script> |
- <script> |
- const expectedValues = [ |
- // [time, element-id, property, expected-value, tolerance] |
- [0.2, "box1", "left", 18, 10], |
- [0.2, "box2", "left", 18, 10], |
- [0.2, "box3", "left", 198, 10], |
- [0.2, "box4", "left", 198, 10], |
- [2.2, "box1", "left", 18, 10], |
- [2.2, "box2", "left", 198, 10], |
- [2.2, "box3", "left", 198, 10], |
- [2.2, "box4", "left", 18, 10], |
- ]; |
+</style> |
+<div id="box1" class="box normal">normal</div> |
+<div id="box2" class="box alternate">alternate</div> |
+<div id="box3" class="box reverse">reverse</div> |
+<div id="box4" class="box alternate-reverse">alternate-reverse</div> |
+<script> |
+ 'use strict'; |
+ test(function() { |
+ box1.style.animationDelay = '-0.2s'; |
+ assert_equals(getComputedStyle(box1).left, '18.6525px'); |
suzyh_UTC10 (ex-contributor)
2016/12/15 23:57:28
Are these values likely to be flaky at all? Should
Eric Willigers
2016/12/16 00:36:17
Changed to use assert_approx_equals.
They shouldn
|
+ |
+ box2.style.animationDelay = '-0.2s'; |
+ assert_equals(getComputedStyle(box2).left, '18.6525px'); |
+ |
+ box3.style.animationDelay = '-0.2s'; |
+ assert_equals(getComputedStyle(box3).left, '198.864px'); |
+ |
+ box4.style.animationDelay = '-0.2s'; |
+ assert_equals(getComputedStyle(box4).left, '198.864px'); |
+ |
+ |
+ box1.style.animationDelay = '-2.2s'; |
+ assert_equals(getComputedStyle(box1).left, '18.6525px'); |
+ |
+ box2.style.animationDelay = '-2.2s'; |
+ assert_equals(getComputedStyle(box2).left, '198.864px'); |
- runAnimationTest(expectedValues); |
+ box3.style.animationDelay = '-2.2s'; |
+ assert_equals(getComputedStyle(box3).left, '198.864px'); |
- </script> |
-</head> |
-<body> |
-<div id="box1" class="box move1 normal">normal</div> |
-<div id="box2" class="box move1 alternate">alternate</div> |
-<div id="box3" class="box move1 reverse">reverse</div> |
-<div id="box4" class="box move1 alternate-reverse">alternate-reverse</div> |
-<div id="result"></div> |
-</div> |
-</body> |
-</html> |
+ box4.style.animationDelay = '-2.2s'; |
+ assert_equals(getComputedStyle(box4).left, '18.6525px'); |
+ }, "animation-direction works with timing functions"); |
+</script> |