Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(3150)

Unified Diff: chrome/browser/browsing_data/browsing_data_remover_unittest.cc

Issue 2566123002: Last visit dates of bookmarks - fix browsing data removal on desktop (Closed)
Patch Set: Adding a unittest Created 4 years ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: chrome/browser/browsing_data/browsing_data_remover_unittest.cc
diff --git a/chrome/browser/browsing_data/browsing_data_remover_unittest.cc b/chrome/browser/browsing_data/browsing_data_remover_unittest.cc
index 3adb0b589b0ba2222a2f09102bd02de8d1ceee20..e9b1505a7806820b85a796ea20ec5aa76a4368be 100644
--- a/chrome/browser/browsing_data/browsing_data_remover_unittest.cc
+++ b/chrome/browser/browsing_data/browsing_data_remover_unittest.cc
@@ -64,6 +64,7 @@
#include "components/domain_reliability/service.h"
#include "components/favicon/core/favicon_service.h"
#include "components/history/core/browser/history_service.h"
+#include "components/ntp_snippets/bookmarks/bookmark_last_visit_utils.h"
#include "components/omnibox/browser/omnibox_pref_names.h"
#include "components/os_crypt/os_crypt_mocker.h"
#include "components/password_manager/core/browser/mock_password_store.h"
@@ -3044,3 +3045,57 @@ TEST_F(BrowsingDataRemoverTest, MultipleTasksInQuickSuccession) {
EXPECT_FALSE(remover->is_removing());
}
+
+// Test that the remover clears bookmark meta data (normally added in a tab
+// helper).
+TEST_F(BrowsingDataRemoverTest, BookmarkLastVisitDatesGetCleared) {
+ TestingProfile profile;
+ profile.CreateBookmarkModel(true);
+
+ bookmarks::BookmarkModel* bookmark_model =
+ BookmarkModelFactory::GetForBrowserContext(&profile);
+ bookmarks::test::WaitForBookmarkModelToLoad(bookmark_model);
+
+ // Create a couple of bookmarks.
+ bookmark_model->AddURL(bookmark_model->bookmark_bar_node(), 0,
+ base::string16(),
+ GURL("http://foo.org/desktop"));
+ bookmark_model->AddURL(bookmark_model->mobile_node(), 0,
+ base::string16(),
+ GURL("http://foo.org/mobile"));
+
+ // Simulate their visits.
+ ntp_snippets::UpdateBookmarkOnURLVisitedInMainFrame(
+ bookmark_model, GURL("http://foo.org/desktop"),
+ /*is_mobile_platform=*/false);
+ ntp_snippets::UpdateBookmarkOnURLVisitedInMainFrame(
+ bookmark_model, GURL("http://foo.org/mobile"),
+ /*is_mobile_platform=*/true);
+
+ // There should be some recently visited bookmarks.
+ EXPECT_FALSE(ntp_snippets::GetRecentlyVisitedBookmarks(
tschumann 2016/12/13 09:03:31 nit: using EXPECT_THAT() with gmock matchers, you
jkrcal 2016/12/13 10:21:15 Done. Well, this 3K+ lines unittest file did not
msramek 2016/12/13 10:34:39 It's fine. I personally do find simple statements
+ bookmark_model, 2, base::Time::UnixEpoch(),
+ /*consider_visits_from_desktop=*/false)
+ .empty());
+
+ // Inject the bookmark model into the remover.
+ BrowsingDataRemover* remover =
+ BrowsingDataRemoverFactory::GetForBrowserContext(&profile);
+ remover->OverrideBookmarkModelForTesting(bookmark_model);
msramek 2016/12/13 09:27:36 You forgot this line, it's what makes the tests re
jkrcal 2016/12/13 10:21:15 Huh :) Sometimes CL-upload-without-local-compile h
+
+ BrowsingDataRemoverCompletionObserver completion_observer(remover);
+ remover->RemoveAndReply(BrowsingDataRemover::Unbounded(),
+ BrowsingDataRemover::REMOVE_HISTORY,
+ BrowsingDataHelper::ALL, &completion_observer);
+ completion_observer.BlockUntilCompletion();
+
+ // There should be no recently visited bookmarks.
+ EXPECT_TRUE(ntp_snippets::GetRecentlyVisitedBookmarks(
+ bookmark_model, 2, base::Time::UnixEpoch(),
+ /*consider_visits_from_desktop=*/false)
+ .empty());
+ EXPECT_TRUE(ntp_snippets::GetRecentlyVisitedBookmarks(
+ bookmark_model, 2, base::Time::UnixEpoch(),
+ /*consider_visits_from_desktop=*/true)
+ .empty());
+}

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698