Convert utility process out-of-process file patching to mojo

chrome/browser/component_updater/component_patcher_operation_out_of_process_browsertest.cc

Index: chrome/browser/component_updater/component_patcher_operation_out_of_process_browsertest.cc
diff --git a/chrome/browser/component_updater/component_patcher_operation_out_of_process_browsertest.cc b/chrome/browser/component_updater/component_patcher_operation_out_of_process_browsertest.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d451f37f4e3df63303d2ff2a2eb3715ab0c2c841
--- /dev/null
+++ b/chrome/browser/component_updater/component_patcher_operation_out_of_process_browsertest.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
+// Copyright 2016 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include "base/base_paths.h"
+#include "base/bind.h"
+#include "base/callback.h"
+#include "base/files/file.h"

[Sam McNally, 2016/12/22 02:45:49]

Remove.

[Noel Gordon, 2016/12/22 05:06:34]

Kept.

+#include "base/files/file_path.h"
+#include "base/files/file_util.h"
+#include "base/files/scoped_temp_dir.h"
+#include "base/macros.h"
+#include "base/path_service.h"
+#include "base/run_loop.h"
+#include "base/single_thread_task_runner.h"
+#include "base/threading/thread_task_runner_handle.h"
+#include "chrome/browser/component_updater/component_patcher_operation_out_of_process.h"
+#include "chrome/test/base/in_process_browser_test.h"
+#include "components/update_client/component_patcher_operation.h"
+#include "content/public/browser/browser_thread.h"
+#include "courgette/courgette.h"

[Sam McNally, 2016/12/22 02:45:49]

Remove these.

[Noel Gordon, 2016/12/22 05:06:33]

Yes, good spot, done.

[Sam McNally, 2016/12/22 05:12:48]

They're still there.

+#include "courgette/third_party/bsdiff/bsdiff.h"
+
+class OutOfProcessPatchTest : public InProcessBrowserTest {
+ public:
+  OutOfProcessPatchTest() {
+    EXPECT_TRUE(installed_dir_.CreateUniqueTempDir());
+    EXPECT_TRUE(input_dir_.CreateUniqueTempDir());
+    EXPECT_TRUE(unpack_dir_.CreateUniqueTempDir());
+  }
+
+  static base::FilePath test_file(const char* name) {

[Sam McNally, 2016/12/22 02:45:49]

Prefer passing these as base::StringPiece.

[Noel Gordon, 2016/12/22 05:06:33]

This code came from the update_client unit tests.  Hoping the folks over there
will take ownership of the current test, so I'd like to retain the code they
use.

+    base::FilePath path;
+    PathService::Get(base::DIR_SOURCE_ROOT, &path);
+    return path.AppendASCII("components")
+        .AppendASCII("test")
+        .AppendASCII("data")
+        .AppendASCII("update_client")
+        .AppendASCII(name);
+  }
+
+  base::FilePath InputFilePath(const char* name) {
+    base::FilePath file = installed_dir_.GetPath().AppendASCII(name);
+
+    base::RunLoop run_loop;
+    content::BrowserThread::PostBlockingPoolTaskAndReply(
+        FROM_HERE,
+        base::Bind(&OutOfProcessPatchTest::CopyFile, test_file(name), file),
+        run_loop.QuitClosure());
+
+    run_loop.Run();
+    return file;
+  }
+
+  base::FilePath PatchFilePath(const char* name) {
+    base::FilePath file = input_dir_.GetPath().AppendASCII(name);
+
+    base::RunLoop run_loop;
+    content::BrowserThread::PostBlockingPoolTaskAndReply(
+        FROM_HERE,
+        base::Bind(&OutOfProcessPatchTest::CopyFile, test_file(name), file),
+        run_loop.QuitClosure());
+
+    run_loop.Run();
+    return file;
+  }
+
+  base::FilePath OutputFilePath(const char* name) {
+    base::FilePath file = unpack_dir_.GetPath().AppendASCII(name);
+    return file;
+  }
+
+  void PatchTest(const std::string& operation,

[Sam McNally, 2016/12/22 02:45:49]

How about RunPatchTest?

[Noel Gordon, 2016/12/22 05:06:34]

Done.

+                 const base::FilePath& input_file,
+                 const base::FilePath& patch_file,
+                 const base::FilePath& output_file,
+                 int expected_result) {
+    scoped_refptr<base::SequencedTaskRunner> task_runner =
+        base::ThreadTaskRunnerHandle::Get();
+
+    scoped_refptr<update_client::OutOfProcessPatcher> patcher =
+        make_scoped_refptr(new component_updater::ChromeOutOfProcessPatcher);
+
+    base::RunLoop run_loop;
+    patch_done_called_ = false;
+    patcher->Patch(
+        operation, task_runner, input_file, patch_file, output_file,
+        base::Bind(&OutOfProcessPatchTest::PatchDone, base::Unretained(this),
+                   run_loop.QuitClosure(), expected_result));
+
+    run_loop.Run();
+    EXPECT_TRUE(patch_done_called_);
+  }
+
+ private:
+  void PatchDone(const base::Closure& quit_closure, int expected, int result) {
+    EXPECT_EQ(expected, result);
+    patch_done_called_ = true;
+    quit_closure.Run();
+  }
+
+  static void CopyFile(const base::FilePath& source,
+                       const base::FilePath& target) {
+    EXPECT_TRUE(base::CopyFile(source, target));
+  }
+
+  base::ScopedTempDir installed_dir_;

[Sam McNally, 2016/12/22 02:45:49]

What do these names mean? Could this test use a single shared tempdir?

[Noel Gordon, 2016/12/22 05:06:34]

Great question (had the same question myself about meaning), /me guesses 

    installed_dir_  -- chrome install directory.
    input_dir_ -- directory where the patch file was downloaded.
    output_dir_ -- directory where the patched result should be written.

Still these dir_ names again come from the update_client unittests, so I just
used their names to make things easier for them to take over this test.

+  base::ScopedTempDir input_dir_;
+  base::ScopedTempDir unpack_dir_;
+  bool patch_done_called_;
+
+  DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(OutOfProcessPatchTest);
+};
+
+// Verify that a 'courgette' delta update operation works correctly.
+IN_PROC_BROWSER_TEST_F(OutOfProcessPatchTest, CheckCourgetteOperation) {
+  const int kExpectedResult = courgette::C_OK;
+
+  base::FilePath input_file = InputFilePath("binary_input.bin");
+  base::FilePath patch_file = PatchFilePath("binary_courgette_patch.bin");
+  base::FilePath output_file = OutputFilePath("output.bin");
+
+  PatchTest("courgette", input_file, patch_file, output_file, kExpectedResult);

[Sam McNally, 2016/12/22 02:45:49]

Use the constants for the operation argument.

[Noel Gordon, 2016/12/22 05:06:33]

Yes, done here and in CheckBsdiffOperation below.  Used the constants defined
for operations from namespace update_client::

Added a TODO re: adding a test with one of files that can't be opened.

+
+  EXPECT_TRUE(base::ContentsEqual(test_file("binary_output.bin"), output_file));
+}
+
+// Verify that a 'bsdiff' delta update operation works correctly.
+IN_PROC_BROWSER_TEST_F(OutOfProcessPatchTest, CheckBsdiffOperation) {
+  const int kExpectedResult = bsdiff::OK;
+
+  base::FilePath input_file = InputFilePath("binary_input.bin");
+  base::FilePath patch_file = PatchFilePath("binary_bsdiff_patch.bin");
+  base::FilePath output_file = OutputFilePath("output.bin");
+
+  PatchTest("bsdiff", input_file, patch_file, output_file, kExpectedResult);
+
+  EXPECT_TRUE(base::ContentsEqual(test_file("binary_output.bin"), output_file));
+}

[Sam McNally, 2016/12/22 02:45:49]

How about adding tests where opening input or output files fails?

[Noel Gordon, 2016/12/22 05:06:33]

Added a TODO about this.