Revert of [ObjC ARC] Reland of Converts ios/chrome/browser/ui/autofill:autofill to ARC.

Revert of [ObjC ARC] Reland of Converts ios/chrome/browser/ui/autofill:autofill to ARC. (patchset #3 id:40001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2555673003/ )

Reason for revert:
Non-ARC files that include autofill_client_ios.h "cannot create __weak reference in file using manual reference counting".

Original issue's description:
> [ObjC ARC] Reland of Converts ios/chrome/browser/ui/autofill:autofill to ARC.
>
> Automatically generated ARCMigrate commit
> Notable issues:None
> BUG=624363
> TEST=None
> Originally landed as http://crrev.com/2513003002#ps1
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/302d816fa77d64bd662c13e64e5a71352b728cfc
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#436645}

TBR=sdefresne@chromium.org,stkhapugin@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=624363
Committed: https://crrev.com/6809e0da7b2a28371b7455e246d70b256fa0bdbe
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#436690}

[rohitrao (ping after 24h), 2016-12-06 20:20:19]

The CQ bit was checked by rohitrao@chromium.org

[rohitrao (ping after 24h), 2016-12-06 20:20:19]

Created Revert of [ObjC ARC] Reland of Converts
ios/chrome/browser/ui/autofill:autofill to ARC.

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-12-06 20:21:10]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 
https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-12-06 20:21:44]

CQ is committing da patch.

Bot data: {"patchset_id": 1, "attempt_start_ts": 1481055619490570, "parent_rev":
"9da963603dc4333e4c7ccb6f84267103557769d3", "commit_rev":
"8e32403fcda513202afd141d97f8d902311100f3"}

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-12-06 20:22:43]

Committed patchset #1 (id:1)

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-12-06 20:25:46]

Description was changed from

==========
Revert of [ObjC ARC] Reland of Converts ios/chrome/browser/ui/autofill:autofill
to ARC. (patchset #3 id:40001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2555673003/ )

Reason for revert:
Non-ARC files that include autofill_client_ios.h "cannot create __weak reference
in file using manual reference counting".

Original issue's description:
> [ObjC ARC] Reland of Converts ios/chrome/browser/ui/autofill:autofill to ARC.
> 
> Automatically generated ARCMigrate commit
> Notable issues:None
> BUG=624363
> TEST=None
> Originally landed as http://crrev.com/2513003002#ps1
> 
> Committed: https://crrev.com/302d816fa77d64bd662c13e64e5a71352b728cfc
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#436645}

TBR=sdefresne@chromium.org,stkhapugin@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=624363
==========

to

==========
Revert of [ObjC ARC] Reland of Converts ios/chrome/browser/ui/autofill:autofill
to ARC. (patchset #3 id:40001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2555673003/ )

Reason for revert:
Non-ARC files that include autofill_client_ios.h "cannot create __weak reference
in file using manual reference counting".

Original issue's description:
> [ObjC ARC] Reland of Converts ios/chrome/browser/ui/autofill:autofill to ARC.
>
> Automatically generated ARCMigrate commit
> Notable issues:None
> BUG=624363
> TEST=None
> Originally landed as http://crrev.com/2513003002#ps1
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/302d816fa77d64bd662c13e64e5a71352b728cfc
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#436645}

TBR=sdefresne@chromium.org,stkhapugin@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=624363

Committed: https://crrev.com/6809e0da7b2a28371b7455e246d70b256fa0bdbe
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#436690}
==========

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-12-06 20:25:47]

Patchset 1 (id:??) landed as
https://crrev.com/6809e0da7b2a28371b7455e246d70b256fa0bdbe
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#436690}

[sdefresne, 2016-12-07 09:42:54]

lgtm

[stkhapugin, 2016-12-13 10:54:26]

lgtm. Seems like it had fixed the bots.

[rohitrao (ping after 24h), 2016-12-13 12:22:38]

On 2016/12/13 10:54:26, stkhapugin wrote:
> lgtm. Seems like it had fixed the bots.

This ended up being unrelated to the failures, so it should be safe to reland.