Chromium Code Reviews| Index: build/config/compiler/BUILD.gn |
| diff --git a/build/config/compiler/BUILD.gn b/build/config/compiler/BUILD.gn |
| index 9426ef1836ab343f3dd3a69f822e502f91799a60..2f991023cf00d051276013da701b2960208510a8 100644 |
| --- a/build/config/compiler/BUILD.gn |
| +++ b/build/config/compiler/BUILD.gn |
| @@ -441,13 +441,16 @@ config("compiler") { |
| if (!is_debug && (allow_posix_link_time_opt || is_cfi) && !is_nacl) { |
| if (use_thin_lto) { |
| cflags += [ "-flto=thin" ] |
| - ldflags += [ |
| - "-flto=thin", |
| + ldflags += [ "-flto=thin" ] |
| - # Limit the parallelism to the sweet spot on most of the machines. |
| - # As of now, ThinLTO does not scale beyond 16 cores anyway. |
| - "-Wl,-plugin-opt,jobs=16", |
| - ] |
| + # Limit the parallelism to avoid too agressive competition between |
| + # linker jobs. This is still suboptimal to a potential dynamic |
| + # resource allocation scheme, but should be good enough. |
|
Nico
2016/12/06 21:08:48
Shouldn't the OS scheduler be ok with linker threa
|
| + if (use_lld) { |
| + ldflags += [ "-Wl,--thinlto-jobs=8" ] |
| + } else { |
| + ldflags += [ "-Wl,-plugin-opt,jobs=8" ] |
| + } |
| } else { |
| # Note: ThinLTO does not currently have this feature implemented |
| # For Full LTO, it provides a measurable runtime speedup of Chrome. |