Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(124)

Side by Side Diff: third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/intersection-observer/zero-area-element-hidden.html

Issue 2556243003: IntersectionObserver: compute correct intersection ratio for 0x0 elements (Closed)
Patch Set: Created 4 years ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View unified diff | Download patch
OLDNEW
(Empty)
1 <!DOCTYPE html>
2 <script src="../resources/js-test.js"></script>
foolip 2016/12/08 16:28:59 It looks like this test doesn't depend on any inte
Sami 2016/12/09 17:24:36 I'll give it a shot. This was just a carbon copy o
3 <script src="../resources/intersection-observer-helper-functions.js"></script>
4 <div id='target' style='width:0px; height:0px; position: fixed; top: -1000px'</d iv>"
5 <script>
6 description("Ensure that a hidden zero-area element is treated correctly.");
foolip 2016/12/08 16:28:59 With testharness.js this can go in <title>, if the
7
8 var entries = [];
9 var target;
10
11 onload = function() {
foolip 2016/12/08 16:28:59 Does the test need to wait for the window load eve
Sami 2016/12/09 17:24:36 You're right -- there's no need to wait for anythi
12 target = document.getElementById("target");
13 new IntersectionObserver((changes) => {
14 entries.push(...changes);
15 }).observe(target);
16 waitForNotification(step0);
foolip 2016/12/08 16:28:59 With testharness.js, this would be: waitForNotific
Sami 2016/12/09 17:24:36 Done.
17 };
18
19 function step0() {
20 // Since the element is initially assumed to be hidden, there are no entries.
21 shouldBeEqualToNumber("entries.length", 0);
22 finishJSTest();
23 }
24 </script>
OLDNEW

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698