Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(58)

Issue 2554583002: Get rid of ImageTransportFactory::GetSurfaceManager (Closed)

Created:
4 years ago by Fady Samuel
Modified:
4 years ago
Reviewers:
piman
CC:
chromium-reviews, creis+watch_chromium.org, yusukes+watch_chromium.org, shuchen+watch_chromium.org, nasko+codewatch_chromium.org, jam, jbauman+watch_chromium.org, nona+watch_chromium.org, darin-cc_chromium.org, piman+watch_chromium.org, kalyank, danakj+watch_chromium.org, James Su, xjz+watch_chromium.org, miu+watch_chromium.org
Target Ref:
refs/pending/heads/master
Project:
chromium
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Get rid of ImageTransportFactory::GetSurfaceManager SurfaceManager was accessible through both ImageTransportFactory AND ContextFactory. This CL removes the accessor on ImageTransportFactory which is redundant. BUG=657959 CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=master.tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_site_isolation Committed: https://crrev.com/f3812452a1a442002c99a61737ebfd06a963b9dd Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#436830}

Patch Set 1 #

Patch Set 2 : Add missing include #

Messages

Total messages: 21 (15 generated)
Fady Samuel
PTAL Antoine! Thanks.
4 years ago (2016-12-06 22:03:13 UTC) #9
piman
LGTM, but I think eventually we'll also want to remove the one from ContextFactory
4 years ago (2016-12-06 23:47:57 UTC) #11
commit-bot: I haz the power
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.org/2554583002/20001
4 years ago (2016-12-07 01:47:59 UTC) #15
commit-bot: I haz the power
Committed patchset #2 (id:20001)
4 years ago (2016-12-07 01:54:19 UTC) #18
commit-bot: I haz the power
Patchset 2 (id:??) landed as https://crrev.com/f3812452a1a442002c99a61737ebfd06a963b9dd Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#436830}
4 years ago (2016-12-07 01:55:52 UTC) #20
Fady Samuel
4 years ago (2016-12-07 02:59:22 UTC) #21
Message was sent while issue was closed.
On 2016/12/06 23:47:57, piman wrote:
> LGTM, but I think eventually we'll also want to remove the one from
> ContextFactory

Yes, we do. I'm currently doing a more in depth audit of what needs to be
refactored. I noticed this and so I thought I'd pick off some low hanging fruit.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698