Index: third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/imported/wpt/offscreen-canvas/pixel-manipulation/2d.imageData.put.dirty.negative.worker.js |
diff --git a/third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/imported/wpt/offscreen-canvas/pixel-manipulation/2d.imageData.put.dirty.negative.worker.js b/third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/imported/wpt/offscreen-canvas/pixel-manipulation/2d.imageData.put.dirty.negative.worker.js |
new file mode 100644 |
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..460e7977140667f6aabd930bc88587c5269173ce |
--- /dev/null |
+++ b/third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/imported/wpt/offscreen-canvas/pixel-manipulation/2d.imageData.put.dirty.negative.worker.js |
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ |
+// DO NOT EDIT! This test has been generated by tools/gentest.py. |
+// OffscreenCanvas test in a worker:2d.imageData.put.dirty.negative |
+// Description:putImageData() handles negative-sized dirty rectangles correctly |
+// Note: |
+ |
+importScripts("/resources/testharness.js"); |
+importScripts("/common/canvas-tests.js"); |
+ |
+var t = async_test("putImageData() handles negative-sized dirty rectangles correctly"); |
+t.step(function() { |
+ |
+var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50); |
+var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d'); |
+ |
+ctx.fillStyle = '#f00'; |
+ctx.fillRect(0, 0, 100, 50) |
+ctx.fillStyle = '#0f0'; |
+ctx.fillRect(0, 0, 20, 20) |
+var imgdata = ctx.getImageData(0, 0, 100, 50); |
+ctx.fillStyle = '#0f0'; |
+ctx.fillRect(0, 0, 100, 50) |
+ctx.fillStyle = '#f00'; |
+ctx.fillRect(40, 20, 20, 20) |
+ctx.putImageData(imgdata, 40, 20, 20, 20, -20, -20); |
+_assertPixelApprox(offscreenCanvas, 50,25, 0,255,0,255, "50,25", "0,255,0,255", 2); |
+_assertPixelApprox(offscreenCanvas, 35,25, 0,255,0,255, "35,25", "0,255,0,255", 2); |
+_assertPixelApprox(offscreenCanvas, 65,25, 0,255,0,255, "65,25", "0,255,0,255", 2); |
+_assertPixelApprox(offscreenCanvas, 50,15, 0,255,0,255, "50,15", "0,255,0,255", 2); |
+_assertPixelApprox(offscreenCanvas, 50,45, 0,255,0,255, "50,45", "0,255,0,255", 2); |
+ |
+t.done(); |
+ |
+}); |
+done(); |