Revert of Introduce a separate FunctionLiteral ID for Eval

Revert of Introduce a separate FunctionLiteral ID for Eval (patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2533303006/ )

Reason for revert:
My assumption that eval and top-level code should be handled differently was wrong

Original issue's description:
> Introduce a separate FunctionLiteral ID for Eval
>
> Top level SharedFunctionInfos will end up in a scripts SFI list, but
> eval'd SFIs shouldn't. Separate IDs will allow for adding a
> corresponding DCHECK.
>
> BUG=v8:5589
> R=marja@chromium.org
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/c6d421ff9aee7f3cab9e48faac88f6b08d2f1cf5
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#41421}

TBR=marja@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:5589
Committed: https://crrev.com/13afe427052768703f691051800ce4d48ce5df99
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#41448}

[jochen (gone - plz use gerrit), 2016-12-02 10:01:53]

The CQ bit was checked by jochen@chromium.org

[jochen (gone - plz use gerrit), 2016-12-02 10:01:53]

Created Revert of Introduce a separate FunctionLiteral ID for Eval

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-12-02 10:02:05]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 
https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-12-02 10:02:08]

CQ is committing da patch.

Bot data: {"patchset_id": 1, "attempt_start_ts": 1480672913545570, "parent_rev":
"226d7315931df2422d3b778958bac04d40276a2e", "commit_rev":
"9e9ee9c6891159d1e18af14c3775e564760b34e7"}

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-12-02 10:02:12]

Committed patchset #1 (id:1)

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-12-02 10:02:33]

Description was changed from

==========
Revert of Introduce a separate FunctionLiteral ID for Eval (patchset #1 id:1 of
https://codereview.chromium.org/2533303006/ )

Reason for revert:
My assumption that eval and top-level code should be handled differently was
wrong

Original issue's description:
> Introduce a separate FunctionLiteral ID for Eval
> 
> Top level SharedFunctionInfos will end up in a scripts SFI list, but
> eval'd SFIs shouldn't. Separate IDs will allow for adding a
> corresponding DCHECK.
> 
> BUG=v8:5589
> R=marja@chromium.org
> 
> Committed: https://crrev.com/c6d421ff9aee7f3cab9e48faac88f6b08d2f1cf5
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#41421}

TBR=marja@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:5589
==========

to

==========
Revert of Introduce a separate FunctionLiteral ID for Eval (patchset #1 id:1 of
https://codereview.chromium.org/2533303006/ )

Reason for revert:
My assumption that eval and top-level code should be handled differently was
wrong

Original issue's description:
> Introduce a separate FunctionLiteral ID for Eval
>
> Top level SharedFunctionInfos will end up in a scripts SFI list, but
> eval'd SFIs shouldn't. Separate IDs will allow for adding a
> corresponding DCHECK.
>
> BUG=v8:5589
> R=marja@chromium.org
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/c6d421ff9aee7f3cab9e48faac88f6b08d2f1cf5
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#41421}

TBR=marja@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:5589

Committed: https://crrev.com/13afe427052768703f691051800ce4d48ce5df99
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#41448}
==========

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2016-12-02 10:02:34]

Patchset 1 (id:??) landed as
https://crrev.com/13afe427052768703f691051800ce4d48ce5df99
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#41448}