Chromium Code Reviews| Index: content/browser/loader/intercepting_resource_handler_unittest.cc |
| diff --git a/content/browser/loader/intercepting_resource_handler_unittest.cc b/content/browser/loader/intercepting_resource_handler_unittest.cc |
| index 9f2096ce76cc344fa15b98a40c0544d459a2b1a0..87ba506334844dd910b3549812e32a2b0545b694 100644 |
| --- a/content/browser/loader/intercepting_resource_handler_unittest.cc |
| +++ b/content/browser/loader/intercepting_resource_handler_unittest.cc |
| @@ -233,6 +233,11 @@ TEST_F(InterceptingResourceHandlerTest, HandlerSwitchWithPayload) { |
| std::string old_handler_body; |
| std::unique_ptr<TestResourceHandler> old_handler_scoped( |
| new TestResourceHandler(&old_handler_status, &old_handler_body)); |
| + // When sending a payload to the old ResourceHandler, the |
| + // InterceptingResourceHandler doesn't send a final EOF read. |
| + // TODO(mmenke): Should it? Or can we just get rid of that 0-byte read |
| + // entirely? |
|
Randy Smith (Not in Mondays)
2016/12/02 20:38:55
I'm assuming you have some way of tracking all of
mmenke
2016/12/02 21:26:52
Erm...Not really. I think there's a high chance o
Randy Smith (Not in Mondays)
2016/12/06 20:46:44
How would you feel about creating a bug something
|
| + old_handler_scoped->set_expect_eof_read(false); |
| TestResourceHandler* old_handler = old_handler_scoped.get(); |
| scoped_refptr<net::IOBuffer> old_buffer = old_handler->buffer(); |
| std::unique_ptr<InterceptingResourceHandler> intercepting_handler( |
| @@ -600,6 +605,11 @@ TEST_F(InterceptingResourceHandlerTest, DeferredOperations) { |
| std::string old_handler_body; |
| std::unique_ptr<TestResourceHandler> old_handler( |
| new TestResourceHandler(&old_handler_status, &old_handler_body)); |
| + // When sending a payload to the old ResourceHandler, the |
| + // InterceptingResourceHandler doesn't send a final EOF read. |
| + // TODO(mmenke): Should it? Or can we just get rid of that 0-byte read |
| + // entirely? |
| + old_handler->set_expect_eof_read(false); |
| old_handler->SetBufferSize(10); |
| old_handler->set_defer_on_read_completed(true); |
| @@ -687,6 +697,10 @@ TEST_F(InterceptingResourceHandlerTest, DeferredOperations) { |
| EXPECT_EQ(old_handler_status.status(), net::URLRequestStatus::SUCCESS); |
| EXPECT_EQ(new_handler_status.status(), net::URLRequestStatus::IO_PENDING); |
| + // Final EOF byte is read. |
| + ASSERT_TRUE(intercepting_handler->OnReadCompleted(0, &defer)); |
| + ASSERT_FALSE(defer); |
| + |
| defer = false; |
| intercepting_handler->OnResponseCompleted({net::URLRequestStatus::SUCCESS, 0}, |
| &defer); |
| @@ -760,6 +774,11 @@ TEST_F(InterceptingResourceHandlerTest, CancelNewHandler) { |
| std::string old_handler_body; |
| std::unique_ptr<TestResourceHandler> old_handler( |
| new TestResourceHandler(&old_handler_status, &old_handler_body)); |
| + // When sending a payload to the old ResourceHandler, the |
| + // InterceptingResourceHandler doesn't send a final EOF read. |
| + // TODO(mmenke): Should it? Or can we just get rid of that 0-byte read |
| + // entirely? |
| + old_handler->set_expect_eof_read(false); |
| std::unique_ptr<InterceptingResourceHandler> intercepting_handler( |
| new InterceptingResourceHandler(std::move(old_handler), request.get())); |