Avoid syncing chrome reference build and LayoutTests to speed up sync.

Avoid syncing chrome reference build and LayoutTests to speed up sync.
Assuming this might also fix 'Out of Memory' issue on Windows bisect bot
BUG=
NOTRY=true

Committed: https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=266311

[tonyg, 2014-04-25 02:37:27]

lgtm

https://codereview.chromium.org/253573002/diff/1/tools/bisect_utils.py
File tools/bisect_utils.py (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/253573002/diff/1/tools/bisect_utils.py#newcode44
tools/bisect_utils.py:44: "src/chrome/tools/test/reference_build/chrome_win":
None,
We should do the reference builds for all platforms, not just win.

https://codereview.chromium.org/253573002/diff/1/tools/bisect_utils.py#newcode45
tools/bisect_utils.py:45: "src/third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests": None,}
Let's also add this one:

src/third_party/valgrind

I think it's 500m.

[prasadv, 2014-04-25 17:09:32]

https://codereview.chromium.org/253573002/diff/1/tools/bisect_utils.py
File tools/bisect_utils.py (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/253573002/diff/1/tools/bisect_utils.py#newcode44
tools/bisect_utils.py:44: "src/chrome/tools/test/reference_build/chrome_win":
None,
On 2014/04/25 02:37:27, tonyg wrote:
> We should do the reference builds for all platforms, not just win.

Done.

https://codereview.chromium.org/253573002/diff/1/tools/bisect_utils.py#newcode45
tools/bisect_utils.py:45: "src/third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests": None,}
Do you mean "src/tools/valgrind", because I didn't find valgrind in
src/third_party

On 2014/04/25 02:37:27, tonyg wrote:
> Let's also add this one:
> 
> src/third_party/valgrind
> 
> I think it's 500m.

[tonyg, 2014-04-25 17:16:21]

lgtm

https://codereview.chromium.org/253573002/diff/1/tools/bisect_utils.py
File tools/bisect_utils.py (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/253573002/diff/1/tools/bisect_utils.py#newcode45
tools/bisect_utils.py:45: "src/third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests": None,}
On 2014/04/25 17:09:33, prasadv wrote:
> Do you mean "src/tools/valgrind", because I didn't find valgrind in
> src/third_party

Oops, yes :)

https://codereview.chromium.org/253573002/diff/20001/tools/bisect_utils.py
File tools/bisect_utils.py (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/253573002/diff/20001/tools/bisect_utils.py#ne...
tools/bisect_utils.py:44: "src/chrome/tools/test/reference_build/chrome_win":
None,
There's also a 64-bit variant of this folder, right?

[prasadv, 2014-04-25 17:23:48]

On 2014/04/25 17:16:21, tonyg wrote:
> lgtm
> 
> https://codereview.chromium.org/253573002/diff/1/tools/bisect_utils.py
> File tools/bisect_utils.py (right):
> 
>
https://codereview.chromium.org/253573002/diff/1/tools/bisect_utils.py#newcode45
> tools/bisect_utils.py:45: "src/third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests": None,}
> On 2014/04/25 17:09:33, prasadv wrote:
> > Do you mean "src/tools/valgrind", because I didn't find valgrind in
> > src/third_party
> 
> Oops, yes :)
> 
> https://codereview.chromium.org/253573002/diff/20001/tools/bisect_utils.py
> File tools/bisect_utils.py (right):
> 
>
https://codereview.chromium.org/253573002/diff/20001/tools/bisect_utils.py#ne...
> tools/bisect_utils.py:44: "src/chrome/tools/test/reference_build/chrome_win":
> None,
> There's also a 64-bit variant of this folder, right?

I checked Win and Win64 builders on chromium.perf, these bots just sync
chrome_win, didn't find 64-bit version.

[tonyg, 2014-04-25 17:25:08]

>
https://codereview.chromium.org/253573002/diff/20001/tools/bisect_utils.py#ne...
> > tools/bisect_utils.py:44:
"src/chrome/tools/test/reference_build/chrome_win":
> > None,
> > There's also a 64-bit variant of this folder, right?
> 
> I checked Win and Win64 builders on chromium.perf, these bots just sync
> chrome_win, didn't find 64-bit version.

You're right. I don't see it now. Maybe it got removed or maybe I
mis-remembered. Anyway, lgtm.

[shatch, 2014-04-25 19:54:34]

On 2014/04/25 17:25:08, tonyg wrote:
> >
>
https://codereview.chromium.org/253573002/diff/20001/tools/bisect_utils.py#ne...
> > > tools/bisect_utils.py:44:
> "src/chrome/tools/test/reference_build/chrome_win":
> > > None,
> > > There's also a 64-bit variant of this folder, right?
> > 
> > I checked Win and Win64 builders on chromium.perf, these bots just sync
> > chrome_win, didn't find 64-bit version.
> 
> You're right. I don't see it now. Maybe it got removed or maybe I
> mis-remembered. Anyway, lgtm.

lgtm too

[prasadv, 2014-04-25 19:55:48]

The CQ bit was checked by prasadv@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-04-25 22:08:06]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
https://chromium-status.appspot.com/cq/prasadv@chromium.org/253573002/20001

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-04-26 00:48:58]

Change committed as 266311