On 2016/11/23 at 22:12:30, dbeam wrote:
> lgtm, but wont this break everything?
Have not looked at the change closely. Is it a breaking change? I thought not,
let's see what the bots think, but will also do a sanity check manually.
Dan Beam
On 2016/11/23 22:14:43, dpapad wrote: > On 2016/11/23 at 22:12:30, dbeam wrote: > > lgtm, ...
On 2016/11/23 22:14:43, dpapad wrote:
> On 2016/11/23 at 22:12:30, dbeam wrote:
> > lgtm, but wont this break everything?
>
> Have not looked at the change closely. Is it a breaking change? I thought not,
> let's see what the bots think, but will also do a sanity check manually.
visually break ripples for paper-icon-buttons without a size variable set
scottchen
On 2016/11/23 22:19:42, Dan Beam wrote: > On 2016/11/23 22:14:43, dpapad wrote: > > On ...
On 2016/11/23 22:19:42, Dan Beam wrote:
> On 2016/11/23 22:14:43, dpapad wrote:
> > On 2016/11/23 at 22:12:30, dbeam wrote:
> > > lgtm, but wont this break everything?
> >
> > Have not looked at the change closely. Is it a breaking change? I thought
not,
> > let's see what the bots think, but will also do a sanity check manually.
>
> visually break ripples for paper-icon-buttons without a size variable set
Did you mean paper-radio-button? If so, there's a default to make it consistent
with the original default size:
https://github.com/PolymerElements/paper-radio-button/commit/77f74b7efdc997af...
Dan Beam
On 2016/11/23 22:43:51, scottchen wrote: > On 2016/11/23 22:19:42, Dan Beam wrote: > > On ...
On 2016/11/23 22:43:51, scottchen wrote:
> On 2016/11/23 22:19:42, Dan Beam wrote:
> > On 2016/11/23 22:14:43, dpapad wrote:
> > > On 2016/11/23 at 22:12:30, dbeam wrote:
> > > > lgtm, but wont this break everything?
> > >
> > > Have not looked at the change closely. Is it a breaking change? I thought
> not,
> > > let's see what the bots think, but will also do a sanity check manually.
> >
> > visually break ripples for paper-icon-buttons without a size variable set
>
> Did you mean paper-radio-button? If so, there's a default to make it
consistent
> with the original default size:
>
https://github.com/PolymerElements/paper-radio-button/commit/77f74b7efdc997af...
yes and yeah, sorry, saw after this comment
still lgtm
dpapad
https://codereview.chromium.org/2526053002/diff/1/third_party/polymer/v1_0/components-chromium/paper-radio-button/paper-radio-button-extracted.js File third_party/polymer/v1_0/components-chromium/paper-radio-button/paper-radio-button-extracted.js (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/2526053002/diff/1/third_party/polymer/v1_0/components-chromium/paper-radio-button/paper-radio-button-extracted.js#newcode40 third_party/polymer/v1_0/components-chromium/paper-radio-button/paper-radio-button-extracted.js:40: if (inkSize === '-1px') { I did a sanity ...
Dry run: Try jobs failed on following builders:
cast_shell_linux on master.tryserver.chromium.linux (JOB_TIMED_OUT, no build
URL)
chromeos_x86-generic_chromium_compile_only_ng on
master.tryserver.chromium.linux (JOB_TIMED_OUT, no build URL)
linux_chromium_chromeos_compile_dbg_ng on master.tryserver.chromium.linux
(JOB_TIMED_OUT, no build URL)
linux_chromium_chromeos_rel_ng on master.tryserver.chromium.linux
(JOB_TIMED_OUT, no build URL)
linux_chromium_compile_dbg_ng on master.tryserver.chromium.linux
(JOB_TIMED_OUT, no build URL)
On 2016/11/24 00:02:45, dpapad wrote:
>
https://codereview.chromium.org/2526053002/diff/1/third_party/polymer/v1_0/co...
> File
>
third_party/polymer/v1_0/components-chromium/paper-radio-button/paper-radio-button-extracted.js
> (right):
>
>
https://codereview.chromium.org/2526053002/diff/1/third_party/polymer/v1_0/co...
>
third_party/polymer/v1_0/components-chromium/paper-radio-button/paper-radio-button-extracted.js:40:
> if (inkSize === '-1px') {
> I did a sanity check, and there is a problem in this line, because inkSize is
"
> -1px" so the comparison fails, which results in no ripple showing. @scottchen
> will follow up with the PR's author to fix this. Holding off this roll until
> then.
Like Demetrios said, after breakpointing here:
https://github.com/PolymerElements/paper-radio-button/blob/master/paper-radio...,
we saw that the value of inkSize is actually ' -1px' (with a space in front of
it).
We were thinking that maybe we need to do getComputedStyleValue().trim(), and it
looks like according to this commit in polymer core:
https://github.com/Polymer/polymer/commit/5231d87f31f53e23dbde1520c903f6ff86f...,
you were also needing to add .trim() to make the unit test pass.
However, I pulled down the paper-radio-button project and ran `polymer test`,
and as you might've also encountered, the value for inkSize is '-1px' and the
unit test passed.
We're waiting for author of the polymer update to see if he knows why there's a
discrepancy between unit testing the component vs. the behavior we're seeing,
will provide more update when I hear back.
Dan Beam
can we jump straight to 1.3.1 now that bicknellr@ has fixed? thanks for the fast ...
Try jobs failed on following builders: chromium_presubmit on master.tryserver.chromium.linux (JOB_FAILED, http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.linux/builders/chromium_presubmit/builds/314720)
On 2016/11/30 at 00:07:33, michaelpg wrote:
>
https://codereview.chromium.org/2526053002/diff/1/third_party/polymer/v1_0/co...
> File third_party/polymer/v1_0/components_summary.txt (right):
>
>
https://codereview.chromium.org/2526053002/diff/1/third_party/polymer/v1_0/co...
> third_party/polymer/v1_0/components_summary.txt:290: Repository:
https://github.com/PolymerElements/paper-progress.git
> On 2016/11/23 22:04:04, dpapad wrote:
> > Not sure why those changed from git to https protocol. I used bower version
> > 1.8.0
>
> this URL is grabbed from the .bower.json for each component. did you change
something in your .gitconfig since you last uploaded a change here?
>
> It doesn't really matter, it goes to the same place.
I did not change anything in .gitconfig. Perhaps the local NPM/Bower version has
something to do with this (3.10.8 and 1.8.0 respectively).
Issue 2526053002: MD Settings: roll paper-radio-button, 1.2.1 -> 1.3.1
(Closed)
Created 4 years ago by dpapad
Modified 4 years ago
Reviewers: Dan Beam, michaelpg
Base URL:
Comments: 4