Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(407)

Unified Diff: components/offline_pages/background/get_requests_task_unittest.cc

Issue 2517383008: [Offline pages] Adding GetRequestsTask to RequestQueue (Closed)
Patch Set: Created 4 years, 1 month ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: components/offline_pages/background/get_requests_task_unittest.cc
diff --git a/components/offline_pages/background/get_requests_task_unittest.cc b/components/offline_pages/background/get_requests_task_unittest.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8fa119fc76b101bf5cfcf1698c718692fec33c30
--- /dev/null
+++ b/components/offline_pages/background/get_requests_task_unittest.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
+// Copyright 2016 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include "components/offline_pages/background/get_requests_task.h"
+
+#include <memory>
+
+#include "base/bind.h"
+#include "base/test/test_simple_task_runner.h"
+#include "base/threading/thread_task_runner_handle.h"
+#include "components/offline_pages/background/request_queue_in_memory_store.h"
+#include "testing/gtest/include/gtest/gtest.h"
+
+namespace offline_pages {
+namespace {
+const int64_t kRequestId1 = 42;
+const int64_t kRequestId2 = 44;
+const GURL kUrl1("http://example.com");
+const GURL kUrl2("http://otherexample.com");
+const ClientId kClientId1("download", "1234");
+const ClientId kClientId2("download", "5678");
+} // namespace
+
+class GetRequestsTaskTest : public testing::Test {
+ public:
+ GetRequestsTaskTest();
+ ~GetRequestsTaskTest() override;
+
+ void PumpLoop();
+
+ void AddItemsToStore(RequestQueueStore* store);
+
+ void AddRequestDone(ItemActionStatus status);
+
+ void GetRequestsCallback(
+ bool success,
+ std::vector<std::unique_ptr<SavePageRequest>> requests);
+
+ bool callback_called() const { return callback_called_; }
+
+ bool last_call_successful() const { return success_; }
+
+ const std::vector<std::unique_ptr<SavePageRequest>>& last_requests() const {
+ return requests_;
+ }
+
+ private:
+ bool callback_called_;
+ bool success_;
+ std::vector<std::unique_ptr<SavePageRequest>> requests_;
+ scoped_refptr<base::TestSimpleTaskRunner> task_runner_;
+ base::ThreadTaskRunnerHandle task_runner_handle_;
+};
+
+GetRequestsTaskTest::GetRequestsTaskTest()
+ : callback_called_(false),
+ success_(false),
+ task_runner_(new base::TestSimpleTaskRunner),
+ task_runner_handle_(task_runner_) {}
+
+GetRequestsTaskTest::~GetRequestsTaskTest() {}
+
+void GetRequestsTaskTest::PumpLoop() {
+ task_runner_->RunUntilIdle();
+}
+
+void GetRequestsTaskTest::AddItemsToStore(RequestQueueStore* store) {
+ base::Time creation_time = base::Time::Now();
+ SavePageRequest request_1(kRequestId1, kUrl1, kClientId1, creation_time,
+ true);
+ store->AddRequest(request_1, base::Bind(&GetRequestsTaskTest::AddRequestDone,
+ base::Unretained(this)));
+ creation_time = base::Time::Now();
+ SavePageRequest request_2(kRequestId2, kUrl2, kClientId2, creation_time,
+ true);
+ store->AddRequest(request_2, base::Bind(&GetRequestsTaskTest::AddRequestDone,
+ base::Unretained(this)));
+ PumpLoop();
+}
+
+void GetRequestsTaskTest::AddRequestDone(ItemActionStatus status) {
+ ASSERT_EQ(ItemActionStatus::SUCCESS, status);
+}
+
+void GetRequestsTaskTest::GetRequestsCallback(
+ bool success,
+ std::vector<std::unique_ptr<SavePageRequest>> requests) {
+ callback_called_ = true;
+ success_ = success;
+ requests_ = std::move(requests);
+}
+
+TEST_F(GetRequestsTaskTest, GetFromEmptyStore) {
+ RequestQueueInMemoryStore store;
+ GetRequestsTask task(&store,
+ base::Bind(&GetRequestsTaskTest::GetRequestsCallback,
+ base::Unretained(this)));
+ task.Run();
+ PumpLoop();
+ EXPECT_TRUE(callback_called());
+ EXPECT_TRUE(last_call_successful());
+ EXPECT_TRUE(last_requests().empty());
+}
+
+TEST_F(GetRequestsTaskTest, GetMultipleRequests) {
+ RequestQueueInMemoryStore store;
+ AddItemsToStore(&store);
+
+ GetRequestsTask task(&store,
+ base::Bind(&GetRequestsTaskTest::GetRequestsCallback,
+ base::Unretained(this)));
+ task.Run();
+ PumpLoop();
+ EXPECT_TRUE(callback_called());
+ EXPECT_TRUE(last_call_successful());
+ ASSERT_EQ(2UL, last_requests().size());
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(kRequestId1, last_requests().at(0)->request_id());
dougarnett 2016/11/28 18:48:41 Is this a more strict check than necessary? That i
fgorski 2016/11/28 19:14:56 Done. And yes, I was piggybacking on implementatio
+ EXPECT_EQ(kRequestId2, last_requests().at(1)->request_id());
+}
+
+} // namespace offline_pages

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698