Rebaselining xfermodeimagefilter

Rebaselining xfermodeimagefilter

Adding new baselines and removing the line in ignore-tests.txt

BUG=
R=bsalomon@google.com, epoger@google.com

Committed: https://code.google.com/p/skia/source/detail?r=11499

[bsalomon, 2013-09-27 14:50:39]

On 2013/09/27 14:47:55, sugoi1 wrote:

lgtm. It's fine to commit these without waiting for an lgtm as there is no real
way for anyone to verify from the diff.

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2013-09-27 14:56:21]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
https://skia-tree-status.appspot.com/cq/sugoi@chromium.org/25062002/1

[epoger, 2013-09-27 14:59:15]

On 2013/09/27 14:50:39, bsalomon wrote:
> On 2013/09/27 14:47:55, sugoi1 wrote:
> 
> lgtm. It's fine to commit these without waiting for an lgtm as there is no
real
> way for anyone to verify from the diff.

Well, the commit-bot certainly requires an LGTM from a Big Powerful Person such
as yourself. :-)

At any rate, I did manually examine all of the diffs and confirmed that only
xfermodeimagefilter tests were modified.

As Brian notes, we do not have a good way for a reviewer to view the pixel
diffs.  So we are at the mercy of the CL creator to do so.  Alexis, were you
able to use svndiff.py (or some other method) to review the pixel diffs, and
make sure they seemed reasonable?

[sugoi1, 2013-09-27 15:00:49]

Committed patchset #1 manually as r11499 (presubmit successful).

[sugoi1, 2013-09-27 15:02:43]

On 2013/09/27 14:59:15, epoger wrote:
> On 2013/09/27 14:50:39, bsalomon wrote:
> > On 2013/09/27 14:47:55, sugoi1 wrote:
> > 
> > lgtm. It's fine to commit these without waiting for an lgtm as there is no
> real
> > way for anyone to verify from the diff.
> 
> Well, the commit-bot certainly requires an LGTM from a Big Powerful Person
such
> as yourself. :-)
> 
> At any rate, I did manually examine all of the diffs and confirmed that only
> xfermodeimagefilter tests were modified.
> 
> As Brian notes, we do not have a good way for a reviewer to view the pixel
> diffs.  So we are at the mercy of the CL creator to do so.  Alexis, were you
> able to use svndiff.py (or some other method) to review the pixel diffs, and
> make sure they seemed reasonable?

Yes I did, svndiff.py worked fine.