Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(2125)

Unified Diff: base/logging.h

Issue 2502953003: base: make CHECK macros trap at distinct addresses in official builds (Closed)
Patch Set: fix comments Created 3 years, 10 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « no previous file | base/logging_unittest.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: base/logging.h
diff --git a/base/logging.h b/base/logging.h
index 5174e6d375540cd0f0bf355034c17812a66bf37b..986eeba88b80261118807ef4d1ff8beb574a22f6 100644
--- a/base/logging.h
+++ b/base/logging.h
@@ -462,8 +462,47 @@ class CheckOpResult {
// Crashes in the fastest, simplest possible way with no attempt at logging.
#if defined(COMPILER_GCC) || defined(__clang__)
-#define IMMEDIATE_CRASH() __builtin_trap()
+
+// This is to make sure that the crash report can pinpoint to the right source
+// line even in presence of multiple CHECK()s in the same function. See
+// http://crbug.com/664209 for more context.
+// There are three things we need to guarantee here:
+// - The trap instructions, and hence the PC value at crash time, are distinct
+// and don't get collapsed into the same op due to compiler optimizations.
+// - The debug line info for the trap instructions get attributed to the caller
+// of CHECK(), to make sure that crash reports show actionable data. This in
+// practice rules out the ability of using a inline function, at least as
+// long as clang doesn't support attribute(artificial).
+// - The compiler should treat the CHECK as no-return instructions, so that the
+// trap code can be efficiently packed in the prologue of the function and
+// doesn't interfere with the main execution flow.
+// Code-wise:
+// - asm volatile seems to be enough to make the compiler emit distinct
+// instructions for each CHECK() and not fold them together.
+// - the actual instructions (e.g., "ud2") are borrowed from implementation of
+// __builtin_trap() in the various toolchain.
+// either a SIGTRAP or a SIGABRT depending on the platform.
Mark Mentovai 2017/02/13 16:22:09 On x86 and x86_64, ud2 will be SIGILL. That’s good
+// - __builtin_unreachable() enables no-return optimizations.
+
+#if defined(ARCH_CPU_X86_FAMILY)
+#define TRAP_INSTRUCTION() asm volatile("ud2" ::: "memory")
+#elif defined(ARCH_CPU_ARMEL)
+#define TRAP_INSTRUCTION() asm volatile("udf $0xff" ::: "memory")
+#elif defined(ARCH_CPU_ARM64)
+#define TRAP_INSTRUCTION() asm volatile("brk #0x3e8" ::: "memory")
#else
+// Crash report accuracy will not be guaranteed on other architectures, but at
+// least this will crash as expected.
+#define TRAP_INSTRUCTION() __builtin_trap()
+#endif
+
+#define IMMEDIATE_CRASH() \
+ ({ \
+ TRAP_INSTRUCTION(); \
+ __builtin_unreachable(); \
+ })
+
+#else // defined(COMPILER_GCC) || defined(__clang__)
#define IMMEDIATE_CRASH() ((void)(*(volatile char*)0 = 0))
#endif
« no previous file with comments | « no previous file | base/logging_unittest.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698