Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(5405)

Unified Diff: components/search_engines/template_url_prepopulate_data_unittest.cc

Issue 2497853002: Create TemplateUrlData to base::Dictionary utility functions (Closed)
Patch Set: Updates after review discussion, just rip out common functions Created 4 years, 1 month ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: components/search_engines/template_url_prepopulate_data_unittest.cc
diff --git a/components/search_engines/template_url_prepopulate_data_unittest.cc b/components/search_engines/template_url_prepopulate_data_unittest.cc
index e57a940cf8947923a3ddc2deaa1f7e8a6dd5cb0d..c1e57b751d6d24fc5fca6edb11d4e957e8df1f12 100644
--- a/components/search_engines/template_url_prepopulate_data_unittest.cc
+++ b/components/search_engines/template_url_prepopulate_data_unittest.cc
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
#include "components/search_engines/search_engines_pref_names.h"
#include "components/search_engines/search_terms_data.h"
#include "components/search_engines/template_url.h"
+#include "components/search_engines/template_url_data_util.h"
#include "components/search_engines/template_url_service.h"
#include "testing/gtest/include/gtest/gtest.h"
@@ -154,6 +155,11 @@ TEST_F(TemplateURLPrepopulateDataTest, ProvidersFromPrefs) {
EXPECT_EQ(0u, t_urls[0]->alternate_urls.size());
EXPECT_TRUE(t_urls[0]->search_terms_replacement_key.empty());
Peter Kasting 2016/11/20 07:57:50 Nit: Why this blank line?
Alexander Yashkin 2016/11/20 20:24:05 Deleted.
+ EXPECT_TRUE(t_urls[0]->show_in_default_list);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(t_urls[0]->safe_for_autoreplace);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(t_urls[0]->date_created.is_null());
+ EXPECT_TRUE(t_urls[0]->last_modified.is_null());
Peter Kasting 2016/11/20 07:57:50 Is it important to check these? If so, should we
Alexander Yashkin 2016/11/20 20:24:05 I saw that fields safe_for_autoreplace, date_creat
Peter Kasting 2016/11/21 02:17:07 Seems fine, but note that if you follow my suggest
+
// Test the optional settings too.
entry->SetString("suggest_url", "http://foo.com/suggest?q={searchTerms}");
entry->SetString("instant_url", "http://foo.com/instant?q={searchTerms}");
@@ -357,8 +363,7 @@ TEST_F(TemplateURLPrepopulateDataTest, GetEngineTypeForAllPrepopulatedEngines) {
TemplateURLPrepopulateData::GetAllPrepopulatedEngines();
for (const PrepopulatedEngine* engine : all_engines) {
std::unique_ptr<TemplateURLData> data =
- TemplateURLPrepopulateData::MakeTemplateURLDataFromPrepopulatedEngine(
- *engine);
+ TemplateURLDataFromPrepopulatedEngine(*engine);
EXPECT_EQ(engine->type,
TemplateURL(*data).GetEngineType(SearchTermsData()));
}

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698